Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 13, 2017.

The Inning[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect title is vague and likely to cause confusion because "The Inning" was never used to describe the Cubs 8th inning meltdown in the 2003 NLCS. The term hasn't been searched much since the article was merged to the target article and although there is some history, nothing is worth salvaging because the contents already exist in the target article or Steve Bartman incident 173.3.79.94 (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Security contractor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was dabify. Will add a few of the articles mentioned to the page right off the bat, but it'll need to be fleshed out. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not all "security contractors" are involved in war? Prisencolin (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dab might be good as it gives the searcher a bunch of options for a term that isn't specifically defined. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify - This can mean a lot of things. Being associated with security doesn't necessarily involve conflict or violence at all. Somebody refurbishing a building, say, can be helping with its physical defense without any kind of connection to soldiering. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per above discussion --Lenticel (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chinese mars exploration program[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 27#Chinese mars exploration program

October 10, 2010[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 1#October 10, 2010

Zombi (2012 Video Game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Zombi(2015 Video Game); no consensus for Zombi (2012 Video Game). -- Tavix (talk) 17:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely capitalized disambiguator. Lordtobi (✉) 09:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The capitals in Video Game and the lack of space before the parentheses are not helpful. The 2012 Video Game is attracting the hits because it is the only one that shows up on the search. The lower-case version properly formatted would show up if the caps version were removed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Next Michel Ancel Project[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 - creator and all commenters recommend deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the title of this redirect means to determin that Ancel has only one project (even though he also operats his own studio apart from Ubisoft), and the redirect is time-restricted. Also someone searching this with all words capitalized is implausible. Reliable sources score zero results. Lordtobi (✉) 09:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not per the capitalisation which is a minor issue at best, but because it may be ambiguous, it will need maintenance, it isn't always going to be possible to point it to an encyclopaedic article and reliable sources may differ on what his next project is. There will also come a time when he doesn't have a next project. Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Can be re-created if he announces another project, although it would more likely start with "Untitled Michel Ancel". AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC) updated 15:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Apparently I was the one that created this redirect 9 years ago. Maybe because BGE2 was referred to as "The Next Michel Ancel Project" on Ubidays. Who knows. Kill it. --JayC (talk) 11:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alberthernandez/sandbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 page unambiguously created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Senseless name - result of inexperienced page move PRehse (talk) 06:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I've seen redirects like these kept, but I think the criterion for keeping is that it has to be used somewhere, e.g. an uneditable talk page archive, from which you can't remove it without disrupting the context of the discussion - thereby altering the archive, which is not allowed. However, no such link appears to exist for this one. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pineapple under sea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to SpongeBob SquarePants. (non-admin closure) feminist 14:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent connection between the two pages Jumpytoo Talk 04:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Folkloric Tradition[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 21#American Folkloric Tradition

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_13&oldid=1136448052"