Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 11, 2017.

Draft:Lego Marvel Superheroes 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect with typo; note that I originally changed the formerly present draft to a redirect to the actual article, but we don't really need the redirect any longer either. Lordtobi () 20:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This can stay as it's been sitting in draft for a month. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep so that the original author knows what happened to their draft. Thryduulf (talk) 09:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Young Vitruvius[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 26#Young Vitruvius

Lord of the rings lego video game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no one will search for the game in this constellation (lacking "The", unparanthesised "lego video game" as disambiguator, all lower-case). Lordtobi () 20:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep useful search to find the lego version of Lord of the Rings. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 07:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep'. If someone doesn't know the exact title of the game this is exactly the sort of search term they would use. Thryduulf (talk) 09:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego indy 2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 26#Lego indy 2

Lij2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely that anyone will search for the initialism in this way. Lordtobi () 20:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I'm seeing searches for some film called Yarada Lij 2. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 07:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, I get the same results. Thryduulf (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all the foregoing. I was about to give it the benefit of the doubt till I saw the pageview stats - a whopping one view in the last month. The mere existence of an initialism doesn't make it a likely search term for something. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 12:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as obscure acronym --Lenticel (talk) 00:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rock Band Lego[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely anyone will ever search for the game this way. Lordtobi () 19:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L:RB[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 18#L:RB

DUP[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to the Democratic Unionist Party. They are the most likely wp:primary topic at present, in light of the torrid state of affairs. --Nevéselbert 16:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is - Although the Democratic Unionist Party now has increased relevance to UK politics for a period of time, outside of the UK they're not so important that they gazump the others on the list at Dup. - Richard Cavell (talk) 17:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The nominator's argument is WP:RECENTISM. It may be that they become the primary topic for "DUP" in the future but they are not at the moment and anything more is WP:CRYSTAL. Thryduulf (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as is. It's also used as a machine-language instruction for the x86. [1] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Article Lego Batman: The Video Game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely someone will ever type that in. Lordtobi () 15:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I fully expected this to be the result of a botched move out of user or draftspace but it was seemingly created deliberately (although I cannot explain why). 12 hits last year is above noise level, but not by enough to justify keeping without further explanation. Thryduulf (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - if we're going to put the word "article" in front of this one, then we have to do the rest for consistency, and we're not doing that. - Richard Cavell (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sure we can speedy this, there's no reason to drag it out for something so unlikely. The total of four pageviews in the last month assert the foregoing. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 12:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible synonym due to the "article" term --Lenticel (talk) 01:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'm sure that we can just be rid of this soon. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Batman characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there is no such list. Lordtobi () 15:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There used to be such a list in the article, and there was edit warring over it's inclusion in 2008 but seems to have finally been removed as "gamecruft" in 2010 by user:Falcon9x5 [2]. Thryduulf (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The ones for the particular video game might go to the video game article's Plot but I don't see where the characters are covered there sufficiently. If you want to consider the most popular entry / WP:RECENTISM, then Lego Batman characters and List of Lego batman characters could redirect to The Lego Batman Movie#Cast AngusWOOF (barksniff) 13:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indiana Jones (Desert Disguise)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There's no prejudice against recreation to target a general article on the concept. -- Tavix (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unnotable WP:GAMEGUIDE, these are costumes available for certain characters in the respective games. Lordtobi () 15:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This would really need WP:TNT especially with all the proper nouns. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 07:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Water suit would go to wet suit first, with other options as hatnotes. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 07:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For Heat protection suit, using that capitalization, I would redirect to Fire proximity suit. - Richard Cavell (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Star Wars the Complete Saga Cheats, Codes, and Tips[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, target article includes neither Cheats, Codes, nor Tips. This a copy of a generic IGN/GiantBomb title. Lordtobi () 15:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Star Wars 3: The Complete Saga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, The Complete Saga is the third in the franchise, but not the third in the story arc, as it is simply a compilation of the two prior games. Lordtobi () 15:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LSW3[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 18#LSW3

The complete saga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, "Complete Saga" could be anything. Lordtobi () 15:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete although recent Internet searches show Lego Star Wars, it has also applied to many other franchises. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Star Wars 2 for Gamecube[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unhelpful redirect sorted by platform. Lordtobi () 15:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Starwars lego psp game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the redirect title is just awful; also, Lego Star Wars 2 is not the only Lego Star Wars ("Starwars lego") game for PSP. Lordtobi () 15:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Universe Chronology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, undisclosed which Chronology this should be, and unlikely to be searched for. Lordtobi () 14:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego universe beta test[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, we don't usually have redirects for certain stages (and never with additional "test" appendix), especiall not in all-lower-case. Lordtobi () 14:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego universe factions[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 23#Lego universe factions

Stromling[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 23#Stromling

Levo universe[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all those not specifically called out to be kept. -- Tavix (talk) 15:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely typos mass-created by troll. Lordtobi () 14:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the second one as a definitely-possible misspelling. Remember that this game and the whole concept is aimed at kids. - Richard Cavell (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unverse, univers, univeres, univese Delete the rest as not likely typos, especially levo. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 07:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego online game[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 26#Lego online game

Lego City: Undercover: The Chase Begins[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus , leaning keep. Further discussion is likely to sway more strongly in the "keep" direction, but given the current backlog this is hardly going to be a priority for the small pool of RfD participants. (non-admin closure)Uanfala 18:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely that anyone will search for this game with two colons, rather completely without. Lordtobi () 14:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment two colons is possible, however, it doesn't appear the original title has gone by Lego City: Undercover AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it seems to be a plausible error, especially since the original reads like a subtitle to me. -- Tavix (talk) 15:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - As stated above, this seems genuinely plausible. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Ninjago: The Video Game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Lordtobi () 17:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, AFAIK, "Lego Ninjago: The Video Game" is an unnotable web game, not the strategy game. Lordtobi () 14:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, according to the coverart (on GameFAQs) Lego Ninjago: The Video Game is the name used in the EU and AUS regions. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - Further to what Salavat is saying, Nintendo's UK website uses that name here. I suggest that we close this RfD. - Richard Cavell (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego Island 3[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Lego Island 3

Lego Rock Raiders (Game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The sole "keep" opinion seemed to express more of a "move to a lowercase" opinion, which would vacate these titles anyway. The creation of lowercase variants should be done at one's editorial discretion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unlikely upper-case disambiguator. Lordtobi () 14:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete let the lower-case disambiguators do its job. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 1, 3 and 4 (but ideally make everything in the parantheses lowercase). Am I missing something here? They are redirecting the user to what they are looking for, and are different from the target in more ways than just capitalization. Delete item 2 as an unnecessary capitalized version of a satisfactory redirect. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't usually have redirects--or articles--with capitalized disambiguators if not applicable, and it is unlikely that anyone will use them anyway. Lordtobi () 09:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego videogames[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is "videogames" a common spelling? Else, delete. Lordtobi () 14:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Of all online dictionaries, only wiktionary has "video game" without the space. The Oxford English Dictionary and Chambers Dictionary (paper versions) do not recognise "video game" without the space. But it's a plausible misspelling and what else is the user searching for? - Richard Cavell (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lego video game[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 23#Lego video game

List of Lego games[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 19#List of Lego games

The Brickster[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#The Brickster

Austin dickinson (vocalist)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 21#Austin dickinson (vocalist)

Infomainiac[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Infomainiac

Are you ready to le[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is not even a proper sentence. Lordtobi () 14:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - the title comes from a series of Youtube videos here. (Not safe for work: Note the username of the Youtube user). - Richard Cavell (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Though should we emphatize for memes/Internet phenomena to concern our redirects? By that means we would have a redirect "loser, loser, you're a loser" to King of the Hill (this was recommended by YouTube from the page you linked me), but we don't. Lordtobi () 20:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable, memes need to meet WP:GNG. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Just a bit of nonsense. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gdanzisk[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Gdanzisk

Dànzica[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Dànzica

Template:Riley family tree[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Template:Riley family tree

Iceland–Yugoslavia relations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 18#Iceland–Yugoslavia relations

Iceland–Switzerland relations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Iceland–Switzerland relations