Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 12[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 12, 2017.

Crontonville, New York[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a misspelling of Crotonville, part of Ossining (town), New York Certes (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Afghanica (cannabis)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 26#Afghanica (cannabis)

Human equality[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Social equality. -- Tavix (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly the same thing. Egalitarianism is the pursuit of human equality, not human equality itself.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  23:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ass (insult)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Asshole#Semantics. (non-admin closure) feminist 06:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There probably is a better target for this. Created by a user indefinitely blocked for creating vandalous redirects. May need to be deleted.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a more appropriate redirect. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure . I (the nominator) am ok with that too.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  19:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Ass" as an insult has two implications: (1) as USA pronunciation for "arse", the human posterior; (2) the animal Equus asinus (donkey, burro), referring to its alleged stupidity. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Labour Party Marxists[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 25#Labour Party Marxists

Parnassus Press[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is certainly not the press's most visible author, and so this redirect is very strange. Vanamonde (talk) 12:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did the small press put out more than the "at least three picture books" mentioned at the target article? It would not be unusual for a small press to have such a small output. If that was the entirety of the press's works, this could be weakly appropriate, since there are no articles on anyone else involved with the press, and it's not discussed elsewhere. A Google search revealed another press of this name, part of the non-notable Pegasus Books, so there is potential for confusion, however. --BDD (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in Svalbard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 20:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Svalbard#Religion consists of a small, unsourced section of barely two sentences. As far as religion goes, there's simply not much to discuss in this Arctic archipelago of less than 3,000 people. Hinduism in Svalbard is either non-existent or not noteworthy at all. Either way, this redirect does not help anyone find out which one it is. -- Tavix (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of current child actors from the Canada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. the Canada? I don't think so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect sounds like something Starfire would say. Steel1943 (talk) 00:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.