Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 29, 2016.

APSU 1000[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect for a specific class name to the university that has that class. The history shows that the article on this class should have been deleted not a redirect (nothing was merged). Ricky81682 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete Wikipedia is WP:NOT a course catalogue -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. But, in other news, the redirect would make an interesting name for a futuristic laser weapon or even a robot of some sort. Steel1943 (talk) 23:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But only an evil robot. A nice robot would have a name like "Janie" Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ikbal Ali Shah/version 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Anthony Appleyard. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect. XXN, 18:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per my response above to Ivanvector. XXN, I recommend checking for edit histories on any ".../version #" redirects in the future. Moving them elsewhere to a different plausible redirect title (such as Ikbal Ali Shah (writer), in this case) is one way to resolve this. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Steel1943. Good solution. Keeping this {{R from move}} is probably not necessary. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

COICAMPAIGN[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete by User:SlimVirgin Lenticel (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a cross-namespace redirect not really in much use. CSD seems to imply anything from article space to Wikipedia space cannot be listed under speedy deletion, hence why this is here. This redirect is probably here because whoever created it forgot to put WP at the start which I have since corrected. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 12:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:XNR. Creating WP: pseudoshortcuts in main space is a common error which we should endeavour to correct. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing this out, Simply south. It was just a mistake I made, so I've deleted it. SarahSV (talk) 00:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ScreenCrush Network[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 17:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is presumably the parent company article, but it has nothing to say about ScreenCrush (and doesn't even mention it in passing). McGeddon (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Family g[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 3#Hillary C. This is vague: Family Game, Family Gathering, Family Glue, Family Gekijo, Family Guns, etc. -- Tavix (talk) 04:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Handicrap[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-neutral word that isn't attested at the article. -- Tavix (talk) 04:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good procedural question: does WP:G10 require the attack to be against a particular person, or does an attack against an identifiable interest group qualify? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
G10 states it's against "their subject or some other entity." Some other entity has broad language, so any attack page against anything could qualify. -- Tavix (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Words and phrases from Family Guy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Despite what the redirect says, the Family Guy article doesn't mention any notable words or phrases from the show. -- Tavix (talk) 04:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twitition[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From my research, this looks like a site created to sign petitions on Twitter. However, it was created by a third party company called branded3 and someone wanting to find anything out about this won't be helped by the target. -- Tavix (talk) 03:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

$22[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there isn't any references to a $22 bill at the article, and there hasn't been since 2011, when the following trivia was removed: "Comic performer and presidential candidate Love 22 produces $22 bills." -- Tavix (talk) 00:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all as misleading. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. I would have loved if there were 22 of these redirects. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Si Trew (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. 2222222222222222222222222222. Oops, guess my "2" key got stuck. Steel1943 (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mispase[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RTYPO, too many typos to be a plausible redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 00:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Шуберт[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN, Franz Schubert is an Austrian and has no affinity to any of the languages that have been rcatted. -- Tavix (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 07:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I added the creator's only other contribution, another unwikified article in what Google Translate says is Macedonian which was redirected to a non-Macedonian composer (Czechoslovakian, in this case). Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Serbian? Not that it matters. Si Trew (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_March_29&oldid=1037903298"