Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 7, 2016.

Talk:Solar system warming[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was  Request withdrawn Boldly. Actually I think I know how to handle this. The redirect was bot-changed in 2009, and the mainspace changed again when that redirect was targeted to a more meaningful title due to a page merge of some sort. Meanwhile, the leftover talk page archives were left sitting there. There's no good way to merge the talk page archives that I mentioned below in my opinion, so I'll leave it, as it is also a bit out of scope of the RfD. I will correct the talk-page redirect to point to Talk:Solar cycle, and remove the outdated section link on the mainspace redirect. Any questions or inquiries, do not hesitate to ping me on my talk. Thanks. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At some point, there was a move/merge involved with Solar system warming and Solar variation. This particular talk page should at least match the target of its main page, Solar cycle, I believe. I'm also unsure what to do with (where to move) pages listed at Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Solar variation/ and Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Solar system warming/resolved this one. Also, "Solar cycle#Solar variation theory" is an outdated section link" — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 23:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FC Spartak-2 Moscow squad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete (bundled closure). The general consensus is that we don't want to keep these XNRs. The retargets was suggested but it was self-admittedly "weak" and only attracted a weak majority, so I suppose defaulting to deletion is appropriate. Deryck C. 14:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 in Hungarian football[edit]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget as above. GiantSnowman 18:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation. When I think of "Hungarian football," I think of the national team anyway. -- Tavix (talk) 02:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget per Patar knight. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix. We also have an article on Hungary's top domestic cup for this year. This was a template created in the wrong namespace. We shouldn't obscure content from readers just to try to accommodate the remaining redirect. --BDD (talk) 13:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 in Singaporean football[edit]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget per Patar knight. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix. We also have an article on Singapore's top domestic cup for this year. This was a template created in the wrong namespace. We shouldn't obscure content from readers just to try to accommodate the remaining redirect. --BDD (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 in Icelandic football[edit]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget per Patar knight. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix. We also have an article on Iceland's top domestic cup for this year. This was a template created in the wrong namespace. We shouldn't obscure content from readers just to try to accommodate the remaining redirect. --BDD (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010–11 in Egyptian football[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget 2010–11 Egyptian Premier League as closest topic match. Deryck C. 14:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tonight's the Night (1934 film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 14#Tonight's the Night (1934 film)

HSDPA+[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Ehspa and Internet HSPA, no consensus on HSDPA+ and DC-HSPA+. -- Tavix (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing deletion of these four redirects with all other existing redirects listed here: Pages that link to "Evolved High Speed Packet Access" to keep (not part of this proposal). Reason: WP:COSTLY. All listed redirects seem to be adressed by this argumentation. Detailled reasons for listing those four here are below. --> HSPA+ and HSDPA exist. There is no HSDPA+ which makes this one an uncommon misnormer (with enough other plausible redirects already existing to aid misspelling during search).

Nightwalker-87 (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep HSDPA+ and DC-HSPA+ They are mentioned in a bunch of news searches, so when these news writers use the term, what do they likely mean? Delete EHSPA I don't see many news hits for that, only a few non-English articles that mention eHSPA. Delete Internet HSPA. I don't see those two words mentioned together in the news articles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Long term evolution advanced[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep the first, delete the others. --BDD (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing deletion of the following redirects with only LTE-Advanced, LTE-advanced and LTE-A to keep (not part of this proposal). Reason: WP:COSTLY. All listed redirects seem to be adressed by this argumentation.

Nightwalker-87 (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete LTE Advanced (descriptor) per nom. Someone typing in LTE advanced will be best served with that and not a bunch of possible strings that suggest more different articles but really redirect to the same LTE Advanced article. Keep long term evolution advanced as the expansion of the term. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hoover, J (ohn)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another implausible rendering of his name (see below). -- Tavix (talk) 04:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J Hoover (ohn)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is certainly an implausible way of writing his name. -- Tavix (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What's an ohn? Are we allowing word puzzle searches? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ohn is a Burmese name! -- Tavix (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Hoover's first name isn't widely used, and no one's going to type in this bizarre rendering when they can just type "John" directly. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 07:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible misspelling and poor use of modifier --Lenticel (talk) 01:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Absolutely not worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_July_7&oldid=1088109569"