Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 6, 2015.

Murder of Trayvon Martin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BLP violating? There was a trial, the verdict was not guilty, so having a murder redirect seems to be a BLP violation?

Possibly a reasonable search term tho, so I am open to being convinced which policy/argument the community thinks is stronger. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - very likely search term and valid WP:POVTITLE redirect. I feel that the title as written isn't making an allegation about a specific living person, so it passes the WP:BLP test. Ivanvector (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep likely search term. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, with the word "murder" appearing 26 times in that article, it's safe to say that it is a likely enough search term. Note that redirects do not need to be neutral if it's a commonly used term. Tavix |  Talk  18:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It is an extremely common search term. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. --Lenticel (talk) 04:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

מחפשים את ספוגבוב[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. SpongeBob has no connection to Hebrew. Gorobay (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Gorobay--Lenticel (talk) 23:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is an English language cartoon, so not Hebrew. Further, this article has no proper name, because it is a descriptive title, so no formulation in Hebrew is canonical. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

They Earth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What? They Earth? Who are they? WP:RFD#D2 Tavix |  Talk  13:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - confusing. Possible typo from "The Earth" I guess. Created by a user called "wangster" who was repeatedly warned for creating nonsense articles over the two days they participated back in 2007. Not worth keeping. Ivanvector (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

כלב[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFOREIGN: "Common words or concepts" are inappropriate foreign-language redirects. Tavix |  Talk  13:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary. This is a general topic with no strong affinity for any language -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since dogs are distributed worldwide and have no particular affinity to a certain culture/language. --Lenticel (talk) 00:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diqiu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFOREIGN: The Earth doesn't have any particular affinity for China (yet). Tavix |  Talk  13:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary. This is a general topic with no strong affinity for any language -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jawani Phir Nahi Ani[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under criterion G6 and article moved over redirect by Spartaz. (non-admin closure) Ivanvector (talk) 18:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it to make space for a redirect. Jawani Phir Nahi Aani needs to be moved here. UBStalk 08:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • That's a requested move. However, the film article seems to be a recreation of a page deleted at AFD: while it was actually deleted as a banned user contribution, there is consensus that the article fails WP:NFILM, and I tend to agree. Notwithstanding that, it should live where it should live, so I'll tag this for the move accordingly. Ivanvector (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Episode XI: The Return of the Jedi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completely wrong sequel number. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both; factually incorrect. And with the way Lucas is going, an Episode 11 is a not-so-far-fetched possibility. Ivanvector (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both, I can see this causing more harm than good. Tavix |  Talk  18:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible synonyms.--Lenticel (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Easy to read list of british monarchs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as confusing and subjective. I don't think this list is easy to read... Tavix |  Talk  03:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as vague. The target has cool portraits though which is nice.--Lenticel (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - old and harmless. Points to the right location. Ivanvector (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete English Wikipedia is not simple: ; Simple English Wikipedia is a different site -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per anon. Steel1943 (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_6&oldid=1138580005"