Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 July 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 29, 2014.

Noni Ιoannidou[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note the first letter in the second word is the Greek iota, not the latin I, thus implausible typo. See IDN homograph attack fro a similar example. TheChampionMan1234 22:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

History of Industrail Cape Breton[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the deletion of "History of Industrail Cape Breton", since the title contains an unlikely misspelling of "Industrial". A speedy deletion was rejected on July 29 because the page was created in 2006; however, the first revision in 2006 was a move to History of Industrial Cape Breton, which remains a valid redirect as of July 29, 2014. G. C. Hood (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Arguably R3 should be broadened, but it's very narrow at the moment and so didn't apply in this case. Anyway, implausible search term, negligible page view stats, no relevant incoming links – delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, the article was only at this location 1 month, before being corrected. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. Unlikely misspelling. EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alas Roban[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alas Roban is not a valid redirect to Batang Regency, suggest deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article and take to AFD if appropriate. I am never keen on deleting redirected articles as a redirect. Better we take a decision on the underlying article. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article should have been deleted via WP:PROD process, so you may safely act as if it was recently created redirect. P.S.: pinging Bearian who redirected this page. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: not mentioned in target article. Although this redirect allows to deduce that Alas Roban is somehow connected to Batang Regency, there is no way to learn what actually is Alas Roban from it, making it useless and misleading. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I honestly can't recall why I did create a redirect, except that it seemed like an easy way out. I have no horse in this race. Bearian (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Dmitrij D. Czarkoff.--Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Gairaigo and Wasei-eigo terms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 19:56, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

all redirects have been fixed now Compfreak7 (talk) 16:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

T:DOC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Nomination Withdrawn (Housekeeping edit) Lenticel (talk) 01:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The result was of the discussion was keep. Nomination withdrawn. UserJDalek 02:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "T" is not a redirect abbreviation for "Template", and it comes up as an article in the mainspace that's actually called "T:DOC". UserJDalek 01:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

T is the generally-accepted pseudo-namespace for template redirects. Keep. - Eureka Lott 01:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_July_29&oldid=1090409128"