Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 14, 2014.

Average frustrated chump[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Almost three years after this was redirected per AfD, no one has taken up the closer's invitation to merge if desired. And indeed, doing so would probably result in more detailed coverage of the The Game than we need. With the phrase not mentioned at the target article, this is no longer a useful redirect. --BDD (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ha, I hadn't even noticed that I and the last AfD nominator both came across this one on Valentine's Day, to which I can only say I'm a {{R from phrase}} fan and happily married. --BDD (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - good spot, and well-reasoned. — Scott • talk 16:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lap-pop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The term isn’t really explained in the article. � (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multiple Set Character[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5, created in violation of a block. Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Novel/idiosyncratic term for this concept, not used in reliable sources. (Also, created by banned user, if that counts for anything, and maybe it does not.) SJK (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Bayanic Texts and scriptures[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. — Scott • talk 15:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

all linked usages have been moved to proper name of the template Smkolins (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Asam Sahitya Sabha[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this page redirects to list of asam sahitya sabha presidents. But, the tile means that there are many literary organisations(sahitya sabha). Actually, only one organisation exists. that is , asam sahitya sabha. this title is misleading. Hence, i request for its deletion. -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 05:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_14&oldid=1037877273"