Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 22[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 22, 2014.

Eat out[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Eating out (disambiguation). --BDD (talk) 13:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It makes no sense to create soft redirect for common English words or phrases. It is acceptable for jargon (technical, sports, ...) which doesn't get an article but makes articles on the subject sometimes hard to understand; but to use it for regular English words is not what Wikipedia is intended for. Fram (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not delete it, let's turn it to an internal redirect to one of the two common definitions - either Restaurant or Cunnilingus. Following the principle of least surprise, I suggest either the former or a disambiguation page. VQuakr (talk) 08:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with VQuakr. This is a common term people use and may look it up on this site. We should include it at least somewhere. Redirecting it to Restaurant would be appropriate, as opposed to deleting it. Tinton5 (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"common term people use" doesn't equal "something people look up" of course. I note you also created Raspy. How many thousands of other adjectives or common word combinations do you believe should be soft redirects? Or why these and not others? Creating a few haphazardly seems strange... Note that we at the moment only have some 1200 Category:Redirects to Wiktionary, most of them not for common words. Changing redirects to wiktionary from soemthing exceptional to something commonplace shouldn't be done at a whim, but probably deserves a wider discussion to see what most people think is acceptable and what isn't. Fram (talk) 17:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above I agree with. Retargeting to Eating out (disambiguation). Tinton5 (talk) 01:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That retarget obviously makes sense, so no problem with this result. Fram (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Windows 7 replacement[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vague synonym, and not the only OS that replaces Windows 7. - TheChampionMan1234 05:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete as vague synonym.--Lenticel (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a lot of people would say the upcoming Windows 9 is the proper replacment. Others would say Android or Linux or ChromeOS or OSX -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unlikely search term � (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Taiguo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No affinity for Romainzed Chinese. - TheChampionMan1234 05:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Donkey meat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Donkey#Economic use. --BDD (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no sense. - TheChampionMan1234 05:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the opening line of the Donkey article; "The donkey or ass, Equus africanus asinus,[1][2] is a domesticated member of the horse family, Equidae." And people do eat the meat of a donkey. 'nuff said. Tandrum (talk) 05:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Empire Center for New York State Policy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect should be deleted. The Empire Center for New York State Policy and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research are separate think tanks, both in New York. At the time this redirect was created, they were affiliated, but according to this article, the Empire Center formally spun off from Manhattan [1] Safehaven86 (talk) 05:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Delete per nom as subjects are two totally different things. Mr. Guye (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Idioma portugués[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, G7. by User:CactusWriter Lenticel (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish is not Portuguese. - TheChampionMan1234 04:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Languages of South Korea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Demographics of South Korea#Languages. --BDD (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 July 22#Languages of North Korea - TheChampionMan1234 03:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia Reference Desk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate redirect to project space. - TheChampionMan1234 03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The reference desk is exactly the sort of project space page that new and inexperienced users need to be able to find quickly and easily without having to first learn about namespaces. To me this is a more significant consideration in this case than the slight chance of confusion for people looking for encyclopaedia articles. Thryduulf (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While technically project space, the page isn't for the project but for our readers. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, if there has ever been a harmless cross-namespace redirect, this is one. (Until a time when the Wikipedia Reference Desk becomes a notable topic, which I hope is never). Note that I participated in the previous discussion and received a ping from Thryduulf. —Kusma (t·c) 13:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I'm willing to invoke WP:IAR on this one. Technically it points to the WP content that our readers want--Lenticel (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Infobox nrhp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-useful cross-namespace redirect Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete WP:XNR target is pipework and not usable to a reader, no information about NRHP can be readily gleaned from it as it is not a nav template -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Cecal pellets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate CNR - TheChampionMan1234 00:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Srong delete This will improperly transclude an entire article if it were used. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 04:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

朝鮮民主主義人民共和国[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 4#朝鮮民主主義人民共和国

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_22&oldid=1039433911"