Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 17, 2013

Non-Western music[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Ethnomusicology --Salix (talk): 19:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orientalist framing, doesn't have much place here - especially annoying is the fact that this redirects to Music of Asia. Literally nothing links to this, I say we delete. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirect this to Ethnomusicology, which I think is the best option, given that ethnomusicology was originally the study of non-western music - I don't think it is worth having a separate article however. Withdrawing recommendation to delete. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That should work. From Ethnomusicology, "While musicology's traditional subject has been the history and literature of Western art music, ethnomusicology was developed as study all music as a human social and cultural phenomenon." That still includes Western music. But this might be the best shot at satisfying a reader who uses this search term. --BDD (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HiDeHiDeHo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. Thryduulf (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not mentioned on the target article. This seems to be a throwaway joke from another hoax, and as such, is a fairly unlikely search term. See HiDeHiDeHo google -wikipedia. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Hidehideho to Hi-De-Ho. Delete Ego White Tray (talk) 03:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely search terms, and the likelyhood of an editor typing two additional redundant syllables to reach a disambiguation page is very unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 20:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The best thing ever in the history of awesomeness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by RHaworth per speedy deletion criterion G3. Steel1943 (talk) 23:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad redirection Eyesnore (PC) 15:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as juvenile, unlikely search term. --BDD (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GUI terminal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Terminal emulator--Salix (talk): 19:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect makes no sense, as GNU Screen is not a GUI application. LFaraone 14:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Nf[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous template working as redirect. Originally pointing to a template that redirects you to another template. The Banner talk 11:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - "Nf" is an abbreviation for "No footnotes", and just like {{cop}} or {{pot}}, should be kept. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Harmless maintenance shortcuts with no other obvious candidate for the space. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Ic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous template working as redirect. Originally pointing to a template that redirects you to another template. By now an illogical name for its workings (no footnotes) The Banner talk 11:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - "Ic" is an abbreviation for "Inline citations", and just like {{cop}} or {{pot}}, should be kept. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Harmless maintenance shortcuts with no other obvious candidate for the space. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a template for integrated circuits, the normal meaning for IC. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - {{cop}} and {{pot}} do not refer to law enforcement nor cookware/cannabis. BTW, the TfD for {{Rozz Williams}} has been open for over one month. When will it be dispositioned? --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm not at all up-to-speed on the requirements for TfD closures/relistings and I don't have time atm to learn them, so I'll not close it myself. Your best bet is to leave a message about it at WT:TFD or WP:AN/RFC. Thryduulf (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • Reply I have left multiple messages at TfD and AN/RFC, with no result to date. Stub sorting is going slowly as well. Perhaps we need more administrators? --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:IC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous template working as redirect. Originally pointing to a template that redirects you to another template. By now an illogical name for its workings (no footnotes) The Banner talk 11:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - "IC" is an abbreviation for "Inline Citations", and just like {{cop}} or {{pot}}, should be kept. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Harmless maintenance shortcuts with no other obvious candidate for the space. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Princess Die[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Born This Way Ball#Controversies per Thryduulf. Salix (talk): 19:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate the more obvious connection is with the dead Princess Di (Lady Diana Spencer, Princess of Wales) 70.24.250.103 (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Files[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 26#Wikipedia:Files

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_17&oldid=1142587486"