Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 October 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 16, 2012

Cultural and Scientific Conference for World Peace[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned in target article, and my prior research suggests it is notable on its own. I'd stub it if I had time, as it is, it should be red per WP:RED. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

French Wiktionary[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Tikiwont (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one will search for a specific language Wiktionary, and if they do, this redirect will annoy them TheChampionMan1234 06:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The stats show that this actually is used, it is the logical target for those searches given that we don't have articles on any of the separate language editions. It is also required for attribution purposes, as this was originally an article that was merged in to target. Finally, it is far from unique, e.g. Kurdish Wiktionary, Cornish Wikipedia Thryduulf (talk) 08:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, the French version is discussed in the article, so this is an rewarding redirect rather than an annoying one (like Kurdish Wiktionary). Siuenti (talk) 11:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment, if it is discuussed in the article, then redirect it to a section --TheChampionMan1234 00:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • It isn't discussed in a specific section, rather the article talks about other languages (specificaly including French) throughout as appropriate. Thryduulf (talk) 10:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - useful for navigation, and I'm skeptical that someone would be annoyed by the redirect who wouldn't also be annoyed by finding nothing. WilyD 09:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.