Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 February 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 9, 2012

American Medical Association Alliance[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete; no justification in the article for this formulation of the organization's name - seems to be a wholly separate organization per the below discussion in any event Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AMAA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion proposed, as it seems unnecessary and confusing. Unnecessary because the acronym doesn't expand to the target page's name, nor does the acronym or anything that it could plausibly stand for appear anywhere on the target page. Confusing because it gives undue prominence to this supposed meaning of the acronym over other meanings: I encountered this page when searching the web to find out what ‘AMAA’ means. The meaning I was searching for was harder to find because of Wikipedia's dominance in giving this meaning for it; that would be reasonable if this were indeed the most common meaning, but I can't find any evidence of that, and given it's so obscure as to not even appear on the target page it seems unlikely. Smylers (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.