Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 5[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 5, 2012

Acid blues[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acid blues currently redirects to Psychedelic rock, which itself doesn't otherwise mention "acid blues". I'm thinking this could be deleted as an unlikely redirect, and/or as per RfD criteria 8 and 10. Most of the links to this are via Template:Psychedelic music and Template:Funkmusic (I'd already removed this from both, but it seems the server cache [or whatever] hasn't yet caught up.) Prior to being a redirect, the article consisted of OR and lacked sources. Gyrofrog (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There's a discussion on Talk:Acid blues#Cleaned up from a point 2 years ago when a formerly OR article full of questionable examples (Velvet Underground "acid blues"?!) was replaced by the redirect. That was an improvement but as pointed out above it is redirecting into an article which doesn't mention this supposed genre. Better without it altogether. AllyD (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Target makes no mention, and the connection seems tenuous. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Yep that was me who made it a redirect and I have seen no evidence of its existence since. Time to clean up an unlikely search.--SabreBD (talk) 18:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AUTOCONV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move per Thryduulf. Ruslik_Zero 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect that could easily be switched to be "WP:AUTOCONV". MZMcBride (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rename per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move without redirect per nom. Some cross-namespace redirects (CNRs) have value, but links to WikiProjects are not often among them and shortcuts even less so. The target in this case is clearly intended for editors, and it is not going to be of use to any new editors who have not yet learned about namespaces (which knowledge would typically be acquired before learning of shortcuts), so there is no value in retaining this redirect in article space. Thryduulf (talk) 13:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move without redirect and do the same to Autoconv. TimBentley (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WPNorthamptonshire Assess[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move per Thryduulf. Ruslik_Zero 16:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace and just generally kind of goofy. Currently classified as a shortcut, but it's not very short. I think this redirect should be deleted. MZMcBride (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

City of Cities[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was  'Relisted' on Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_December_31#City_of_Cities. Ruslik_Zero 16:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Several cities have this alternative name, including London, Paris and NYC. Makecat 13:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lawrence J. Cohen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lawrence J. Cohen IMDB is not the Lawrence Cohen (politician) of the article Jim1138 (talk) 05:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Weeaboo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 24#Weeaboo. Thryduulf (talk) 10:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_December_5&oldid=1167721341"