Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 October 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 25, 2011

File:2yr.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace image, retitled and usage updated. No need for a redirect. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete slowly. Redirects following file moves of this type are useful to keep around for a short while to help people find the new location. In this case the move was 10 days prior to the nomination and should be at least 7 days longer ago than this when this discussion is closed, which seems long enough to me. This discussion should not imho be closed early though. Thryduulf (talk) 22:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Won't Eat Prunes Again[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of songs by "Weird Al" Yankovic#Songs not commercially released. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, unlikely search term. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to List of songs by "Weird Al" Yankovic#Songs not commercially released. First of all in the interests of transparency I must declare an interest - because I hate prunes I have an inherent empathy with the title. :-) It also gets effectively no hits (keeping is not looking good now, I agree). However, it is mentioned at the suggested retarget and because it is entirely harmless it fails to meet any deletion criterion so, since we are here, and redirects are cheap, we may as well point it somewhere may it may be useful. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Bridgeplayer.--Lenticel (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:IMG 4866.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete, G6 housekeeping. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page retitle from procedural name, all uses updated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amy Crackhouse[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete G10. GB fan 00:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully self-explanatory. – hysteria18 (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: While there's >5000 Google results, I see no reliable sources. Therefore, I see no reason to keep this offensive redirect. TimBentley (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I wouldn't object to a G10 speedy either. Thryduulf (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as G10 and tagged as such. Pejorative nicknames can be fine as redirects provided that they can be reliably sourced which this one can't be. I notice, in passing, that this was the only contribution by the creator. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_25&oldid=1136722210"