Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 28, 2011

Complex Television Interface Adapter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep both. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both are redirects to an article about a video chip in Atari computers, called Color Television Interface Adaptor. I'd like to see both redirects deleted because as a longtime Atari enthusiast I'm pretty sure that the chip was never called "Complex..." in any literature, and the existence of these redirects would only cause confusion. I have never seen this chip called "Complex..." in any Atari-related documents, technical manuals or literature. A quick search on Google [1] [2] shows only 8 results, all of them pointing to either a Wikipedia mirror, or a single user-comment on engadget.com. The redirects were both created in 2004 by the same person, and they don't contain useful page history - soon after creation they were both redirected to a CTIA article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krótki (talkcontribs)

  • Keep both. While I agree that the pages were probably created as an error, the redirects do not cause any confusion. Since most references are only to the acronym CTIA, "complex" for "color" is a plausible bad guess. The existence of a redirect is explicitly not an endorsement of a particular title. (If it were, we'd have to get rid of all the redirects from spelling mistakes - and that would be a huge disservice to our readers.) Rossami (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Νovember 27[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete as G4 (by Donald Albury (talk · contribs)) (non-admin closure) →GƒoleyFour← 19:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The first letter is the Greek letter nu, not a Latin "n". Already deleted, along with many other similar redirects: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_6the Man in Question (in question) 18:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, completely implausible that anyone would type one Greek letter and all the rest English letters in English Wikipedia. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, a textbook example of implausibility. Thryduulf (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bursey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate (non-admin closure) →GƒoleyFour← 00:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the redirect since it prevents users searching on the name Bursey from seeing more than the one article - there are now at least two Timbuk3 (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace with a disambiguation page or add a hatnote, as that's what they're for. You don't need an RfD to do either. Thryduulf (talk) 15:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.