Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 August 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 13, 2011

The Touch Screen Effect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed as now out of scope. The creator has restored the article. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Essay with no encyclopedic content that was turned into a redirect. The redirect does not serve any valid purpose per WP:REDIRECT. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:34, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I'm the one who turned it into a redirect, I have no problem with it being deleted. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Placeholder book.svg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete F2. Ruslik_Zero 10:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of redirects doesn't work, and it's not necessary anyway. The image is on Commons, so a categorization from our side is redundant. Also, since placeholders are deprecated and this image is now orphaned in the article namespace, linking to an old page is more confusing than helpful. The Evil IP address (talk) 19:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tyler Alexander Mann[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 09:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this redirect is really necessary JDDJS (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - redirecting a non/marginally notable actor to a single role is always a real bad idea. Per WP:REDLINK delete and wait for (possible) notability. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TORCON[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 10:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally created because the page TOR:CON existed. There's no need for an all caps redirect now. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with it for now, as it goes to a legit disambig page for a convention that used the name, and not one of Bowser's unnecessary projects. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will you stop bringing me up in stuff? USER. AFFILIATIONS. WITH. PAGES. ARE. NOT. RELEVANT. TO. THESE. DISCUSSIONS. I have no stock at all in the outcome of this discussion, but whether it went to something I made vs. any other whatever that's out there is absolutely irrelevant. I am finding it to be that your arguments in these discussions are more about your differences with me than the actual content.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 01:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Carrie Finklea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 09:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per rule 10. Redirect from an actress to a movie which holds no information about that actress apart from listing her role. Ulkomaalainen (talk) 02:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gengelbert Humperdinck[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Anthony Bradbury as CSD G3. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as improbable misspelling. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_August_13&oldid=1141906609"