Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 October 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 27, 2010

Adam Gay Video Directory[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonnotable porn publication redirected without explanation to article on one of its several former editors; target article has no useful content regarding publication itself. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:43, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - if the magazine is non-notable then there is no benefit in keeping a red link so we may as well redirect it to a page that has some information about it. Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per Bridgeplayer. --78.101.170.162 (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Bridgeplayer. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Megapolis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was converted to a disambiguation page and hence out of scope of RFD. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting removal of redirect for Megapolis to Megalopolis in order for search for Megapolis to produce results for "Megapolis (city type)" and "Megapolis (event)" (which links to Megapolis Festival page).

Removal of the redirect page is unnecessary. The redirect page can be rewritten as a disambiguation page, with links to both targets. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Action completed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Talk:Cum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was undo redirect. Done. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split off. Cum is a separate page which should have its own talk page. 86.5.223.186 (talk) 18:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Semen is not the only meaning of the word "cum". Talk:Cum should either cover all aspects or simply not exist. JIP | Talk 18:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Tove Torvalds[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tove Torvalds currently redirects to her husband, Linus Torvalds. Redirecting one person to another sounds just plain wrong, as if Tove were nothing but an extension of her husband. This has previously been discussed at Talk:Linus Torvalds#Tove Torvalds. If Tove Torvalds is notable, she should have her own article. Otherwise the entire page Tove Torvalds should be deleted. I don't care which of them happens, provided that one of them does. JIP | Talk 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - redirecting relatives to the article of a notable relation is just fine provided that, as here, there is something useful to say. "Redirecting one person to another sounds just plain wrong, as if Tove were nothing but an extension of her husband." is simply wrong, see WP:RNEUTRAL. Redirects are simply search aids and have no implications about the status of the subject. If the person is notable then the way forward is to convert the redirect to an article. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Redirecting in this case makes perfect sense. Agree completely with Bridgeplayer. Shadowjams (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Antal Deutsch[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: invalid redirect, most probably created when the target article contained incorrect info "born as Antal Deutsch", now removed. Kérek kerék kerek (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as confusing. I can't find any reliable source that 'Deutsch' was the guy's birth name. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing. Not mentioned in the target article at all. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Confusing and unhelpful. Someone typing in "Antal Deutsch" could very well be looking for someone else. Jafeluv (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_27&oldid=1138577488"