Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 March 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 25, 2010

Heavy Heavy Low Low (album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not the name of the album. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - "Heavy Heavy Low Low" is the name of the group, not the album. Delete as potentially confusing. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the article Heavy Heavy Low Low indicates they might have a self-titled album, so this redirect is especially inappropriate. –Grondemar 23:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Zealot (1996 Muslimgauze albuml)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete, but the redirect without 'l' at the end may be created. Ruslik_Zero 14:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable misspelling. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not likely anybody will mistype an "l" at the end of that long search term. –Grondemar 23:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Harmless. Deletion offers no benefits I am aware of. There may be some I'm not aware of, however...also (this may be something to do with the software) it has a strangely high amount of traffic, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete; traffic is not insignificant (~40 or so hits a month), though I've corrected the link to it from Bryn Jones discography, which was the only one, and some of the traffic might be due to people who type "Zealot" into the searchbox and find "Muslimgauze albuml" a more obvious and descriptive disambiguator than "EP." If this is deleted, I recommend creating Zealot (1996 Muslimgauze album) to satisfy those people.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 05:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Hammer & Sickle (Muslimgauze 7" vinyl)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus. Ruslik_Zero 18:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Article was at this title since creation in January 2007 until exactly 30 seconds before this nomination. I see no reason to break incomming links, bookmarks, mirror sites, etc. Thryduulf (talk) 08:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as improbable search item as no one (save someone trying to buy a copy of the 7" vinyl single) would be looking for an article on a song with that title and that exact format. Much more likely would be Hammer & Sickle (song) (which exists) or Hammer & Sickle (single) (which does not). Since deletion is only a matter of time (if we wait a month or two, the redirect would be deleted anyway), this is a case in which deletion would not be increasing the problem of link rot. There is no need to perpetuate such a malformed title of either a redirect or an article. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Curse Ov Dialect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 23:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created three years after an AfD for the similar "Curse ov Dialect" was closed as a "speedy delete" as a copyvio. Redirect was blanked by User:58.161.113.30 with the edit comment "not the same group, no reason this page should redirect to TZU". I am neutral on this after restoring the redirect to take it here for deletion discussion. B.Wind (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. According to the target article, TZU "combin[ed] members of the groups Curse ov Dialect and Pan." But having some of the same members is not a very good reason to redirect Curse Ov Dialect there; the article is not about Curse ov Dialect and contains no other mention of them.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 04:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very weak delete - had the target had more mention of this group, my recommendation would be "keep", but TZU is not a continuation of Curse Ov Dialect, and there is no real reason to keep the redirect. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 17:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. There is another redirect—Curse ov Dialect, which should probably be deleted as well. Ruslik_Zero 18:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

RibbonX[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ribbon (computing). ~ mazca talk 12:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as "RibbonX" appears nowhere in the target article; furthermore, targeted section appears to be long gone. Page blanked by User:91.13.202.130; I restored the redirect for deletion discussion here. B.Wind (talk) 04:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to neutral as my original intention was rely upon people who know far more than I about the topic. B.Wind (talk) 03:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Microsoft Office 2007#Ribbon. RibbonX is the programming interface for the Ribbon interface. Seems a likely search term. –Grondemar 12:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Below target would work as well; I am neutral between the two. –Grondemar 00:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it would be better because this is not unique to Office 2007. It persists in Office 2010 and is licensed for use in other, non-Microsoft products. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Ribbon (computing), which is more specifically about the Ribbon UI, and needs a section on its RibbonX API. It is a likely search term. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Template:Aesthetics navigation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do delete this for cleanup. Thank you. Greg Bard 01:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, no significant incoming links, not needed as a search term, no reason to keep. –Grondemar 03:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_25&oldid=1148046902"