Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 19, 2010

John Hutton (The Right Honourable)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect to a disambiguation page. The former UK govt minister John Hutton (Labour MP) is indeed formally titled The Right Honourable John Hutton (because he is a Privy Councilor), but it would be a very odd search term.

The article currently at John Hutton (Labour MP) was once at John Hutton (The Right Honourable), but it was moved from that name more than 4 years ago.

After various subsequent page moves, the redirect now points to the disambiguation page. It might be appropriate to redirect it to John Hutton (Labour MP), but since there have been two other MPs of the same name, that may not be accurate (they may also have been privy counsellors). So it seems best to delete this one. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - this redirect has finished up at the present target due to meddling by bots. However, the stats show that it is not being used as a search term and it has not been widely picked up by the mirrors here, so deletion would cause no harm. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - highly unlikely search term, and not needed for historical purposes. Robofish (talk) 00:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Club atletico chalaco[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. NAC. —  Glenfarclas  (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lower case letters in Atletico and Chalaco are typos MicroX (talk) 20:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - plausible search term; harmless; long-standing redirect; doesn't meet any of the deletion criteria. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Plausible search term. --Mkativerata (talk) 08:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Chester City (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a disambig, just a redirect, and nobody is going to search for "Chester City (disambiguation)". Also, there's a disambig page called Chester City -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Chester City. Largely unnecessary, but harmless and non-confusing; sometimes people will search for the disambiguation page if they expect the bare title will be dedicated to one particular instance that they're not interested in.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Chester City as the obviously correct target. We don't delete XYZ (disambiguation), even when they are redirects, since they have a role as described at WP:INTDABLINK. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Manchester Apollo Manchster, UK 6/5/05[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per typo. Kayau Voting IS evil 15:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Gets about 10 or so hits per month, but I'd guess this is because it, and not the correctly spelled version, comes up in the search box when you type "Manchester Apollo." That should change when this is gone; even if it didn't, the search results would bring up the right target.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - this is a long-standing redirect that has been picked up widely by the mirrors - see here. Deletion would cause red links in external sites for no purpose since it is harmless. Doesn't meet any of the deletion criteria. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: related HD thread here. Kayau Voting IS evil 01:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Argument from reason[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed as wrong forum. Requests to delete redirects to make room for a page move should be made at WP:RM since there may be other considerations. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We should delete this redirect and move the article to this namespace for proper title format. Greg Bard 00:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Tibetan mythology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was converted to a disambiguation page by Bridgeplayer; speedy close as no longer a redirect. WP:NAC. —  Glenfarclas  (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is confusing. It leads to the Tibetan religion Bön, however, Tibetan mythology also comes from what some scientists call Nameless Religion and for a great part from Tibetan Buddhism; even though my summary may not be complete. This redirect does not help the reader. Davin (talk) 09:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_19&oldid=1148047720"