Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 6, 2010

T:[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Courcelles 14:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as unused cross namespace redirects. Mhiji (talk) 21:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: Unlike WP:, T: is not a namespace name on this project. These redirects are indeed in the main article namespace. Uncle G (talk) 10:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all The problem with the T-prefixed pseudo-namespace is that unlike MOS-prefixes they have ambiguity as to whether they refer to the "Talk" namespace or the "Template" namespace. With that in mind, we should probably delete most everything in Special:PrefixIndex/T: as well, except those of course with definable histories and significant rankings in page view stats.:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 22:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all and find find moar and delete them too. Article space for articles (and redirects.. and dabs. and SIAs.. and peace...) ! Rich Farmbrough, 18:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

User:Jet123/Sandbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User renamed, no longer any need for these. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Godwin Colleseum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual spelling mistake redirect, no significant incoming links or page view stats. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Haunting the Barn (Flashpoint epidsode)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual spelling mistake redirect, no significant incoming links or page view stats. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Who would think to spell episode epidsode? →GƒoleyFour (GSV) 22:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A telly addict with a cold? Rich Farmbrough, 18:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Group of Seven(artists)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual redirect from missing space, no significant incoming links or page view stats. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is an implausible search term. Cunard (talk) 10:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nobody would ever type this. — Anomalocaris (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Strategic Response Unit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Re-targeted to List of special response units. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vague redirect, there are plenty of other "Strategic response units" out there. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Either it should be made disambig to different SRU articles or left temporarily as redirect (as it is now). Deleting it entirely is not a good option IMHO - someone can search info about this topic. Sir Lothar (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of special response units for which this is a plausible search term for a reader who isn't sure of the correct designation of such an unit. Bridgeplayer (talk) 03:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Pour les nuls[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in article, almost no page view stats. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete French-language redirect from the French title for the "For Dummies" series of books 65.94.47.218 (talk) 06:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The page view stats returns an appreciable number of hits (25 in November). Because the redirect has been a useful navigational tool for readers, it should be kept. Cunard (talk) 10:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Paint.NET v3.5.4[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual redirect, someone searching for different versions can just go look at the paint.net article and omit the version number. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Htm 5[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual redirect, the correct file extension would be .htm, not .htm 5. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep "HTM" is taken to mean "HTML" in this context, as ".htm" is a common extension for HTML files, so it is obvious that people wanting v5 of HTML would type "HTM 5" . 65.94.47.218 (talk) 06:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Manuela Testolini[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. There is no BLP issue. She is mentioned in the article as being his wife and that is sourced. There is nothing negative and it is sourced. -- JLaTondre (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was an AfD on this article a couple of years ago indicating a lack of notability. The link here is a BLP violation, in that apparently there is a claim that this woman slept with Prince. Since the name of this person is not even mentioned in the Prince article and there are no reliable sources, this is a BLP violation. Corvus cornixtalk 04:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manuela Testolini was the wife of Prince. She is mentioned in the article. And it is sourced. I think there has been some misunderstanding. SilkTork *YES! 09:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Raiwand, AF[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:30, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Newly created confusing and possible misleading redirect. Raiwand, AF originates from only one document and it is absolutely unclear that the term in this document refers to the city "Raiwind" in Pakistan. IQinn (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Glossary of .... Term is notable wan while there is only one Raiwand (which is in PK) , there is Maiwand in AF. Rich Farmbrough, 17:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_December_6&oldid=1143528521"