Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 March 7

March 7[edit]

Impolitic → Decision making[edit]

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear what "impolitic" has to do with Decision making. I recommend deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also according to the definition at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impolitic this clearly has no relation with the target and borders on a POV redirect. Lets drink Tea 19:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no plausible target for this word. --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete as not directly related to the target. PaulJones (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

OMGWTFPOLARBEAR → Lost (TV series)[edit]

The result of the discussion was Deleted. Merge didn't stick so no need to keep history for GFDL compliance. -- JLaTondre (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this was an article that's AfD resulted in "Merge and Redirect" but was based on some blog. Why this exists has been questioned on the Lost talk page. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 14:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NEO, also it looks like nonsense from the POV of someone who doesn't know what it means. Lets drink Tea 15:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OT Jimbo apparently does:http://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/1271191441--Cerejota (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but I guess that's the first thing that came to my mind when I saw it... Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 02:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - offensive name redirecting to a TV show. Versus22_talk 15:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not really offensive but unknown to everyone but a small group of bloggers. Tavix (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - redirect to Deus ex machina.--Cerejota (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Karatedo Kid → Jack and Jill School[edit]

The result of the discussion was Re-targeted to Karate Kid. -- JLaTondre (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leans more on advertising. "Karatedo Kid" does not only refer to the school where this redirect points to. Xeltran (talk) 10:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too broad of a redirect, should probably be a disambig or something; or redirect to Karate Kid Lets drink Tea 16:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Karate Kid as alternate name (karate-do is a synonym of karate, at least as far as Wikipedia is concerned). --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per above comments. Versus22_talk 15:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Karate kids → Jack and Jill School[edit]

The result of the discussion was retarget (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 03:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be for advertising. "Karate Kids" does not only refer to the school where this redirect points to, or to the students learning the martial art. Xeltran (talk) 10:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably redirect to Karate Kid or something instead? c h ¹⁰ · 13:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Karate Kid as plural of disambiguation term.--Rogerb67 (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to Karate Kid PaulJones (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per above comments. Versus22_talk 15:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Jack&Jill → Jack and Jill School[edit]

The result of the discussion was retargeted to Jack and Jill per very clear consensus. Closing per WP:SNOW. (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to lean more on advertising than being informational. This doesn't relate to the other more popular Jack and Jill, besides, there are no spaces between the ampersand (&) so people typing it that way to get to Jack and Jill are less likely. Xeltran (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to the disambiguation page Jack and Jill; the version without spaces may be unlikely but it's possible. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Jack and Jill as plausible misspelling.--Rogerb67 (talk) 23:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Jack and Jill as the term can be used for much more than a particular school. PaulJones (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per above comments. Versus22_talk 15:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.