Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 March 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 6[edit]

Whatsnew, Dogg, Innit, Lazyass → Slang[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete all and retarget Dogg to dog per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specific slang terms redirecting to general article on slang. Specific terms are not mentioned in target article. Delete as pointless. Mike R (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Neologisms that while examples of slang are unlikely to have the same linguistic meaning as slang in the foreseeable future. Would not object to dogg be retargeted to dog as a plausible misspelling. --Allen3 talk 17:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Dogg to Dog; I think it's a reasonable search term. Delete the others, they don't pooint to anything useful, and I can't imagine anything useful for them to point to. — Gavia immer (talk) 03:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pointless redirects, except Dogg per above LetsdrinkTea 20:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget where possible, otherwise delete It is not useful to the general reader to redirect random examples of categories of word to that category.--Rogerb67 (talk) 23:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

lazy???? tf lol i've been on vacay thank you mofucka

List of templates → Wikipedia:Template messages[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate CNR, no history to preserve MBisanz talk 05:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 LetsdrinkTea 20:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: CSD R2 says "except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces.", so it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion -- IRP ☎ 23:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Warnings vandalism → Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate CNR that does not link to content, no history to preserve. MBisanz talk 05:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 LetsdrinkTea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inappropriate cross-namespace redirect. --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Otheruse → Wikipedia:Template messages/General[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR that does not link to content. MBisanz talk 05:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 LetsdrinkTea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inappropriate cross-namespace redirect. --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikistress → Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot[edit]

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion: this is an unnecessary cross-namespace redirect and is not linked in many pages, or in important places (it's just linked on a few user talk pages and essays, and those links can be cleaned up rather easily. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 00:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Per CSD R2, also appears to be a Neologism LetsdrinkTea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete More appropriate as a neologism article, should the term become sufficiently notable (R2 does not apply to Wikipedia: namespace). --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

MOSDABRL → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Red links[edit]

The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath (talk) 06:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reopening discussion. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Recently created cross-namespace redirect that saves the typing of one colon (over MOS:DABRL). Poor cost-benefit ratio. Rogerb67 (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete little usefulness, nothing linking there. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 00:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. CNR's are not good for these types of pages. Versus22 talk 05:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 LetsdrinkTea 20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • R2 doesn't apply to redirects to Wikipedia: namespace. Unfortunately. --Rogerb67 (talk) 23:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the nom. MOS:DABRL alreadys takes care of this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Heh, I remember created the MOS:DABRL shortcut a while back. Tavix (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It presently has few links, and perpetuates bad habits among new editors. +mt 16:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and for setting a bad precedent. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 19:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_March_6&oldid=1138576871"