Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 May 14

May 14[edit]

Laura Baileyd → Kiddy Grade[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 14:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelt page that should have been speedied from the get go (had no content and there was a pre-existing article under the correct spelling) but was instead turned into a redirect. Since it has no incoming links and is not even pointing in the right direction it will not be missed. Shiroi Hane 00:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Laura Bailey – Gurch 16:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per R3, implausible typo. Yechiel Man 01:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Curricula vitarum → Résumé[edit]

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "that's good enough for me", re-open if not) – Gurch 07:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely and ungrammatical: The plural of curriculum vitae is curricula vitae. Ironically, there's no curricula vitae redirect. —^Jack_Lumber^/tɔk/ 13:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a bit of quick googling reveals that several people have felt it worthwhile to write articles explaining why this bit of pidgin-Latin is incorrect. That suggests that it's commonly-used enough to justify the redirect. I have tagged it as a misspelling (but not as a plural, since it's not a proper pluralization, ~~and is grammatically still singular~~ (oops, wrong on that last, for some reason, I misread this as "curriculum vitarum")). That should be good enough. (I also note that someone has created the formerly-ironically-missing redirect; I went ahead and tagged that as "alternative name" and "plural".) Xtifr _tälk 17:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's good enough for me. (Curriculum vitae, Curriculum vitae, Curriculum vitae starts with C). —^Jack_Lumber^/tɔk/ 20:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

UK-US heterologues A-Z → List of words having different meanings in British and American English[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 17:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Previously nominated for deletion; however, the very Heterologue article is gone, so this redirect is now moot. This article's history has no practical relevance; it was just a bad idea after all. —^Jack_Lumber^/tɔk/ 14:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

UK-US Heterologues A-Z → List of words having different meanings in British and American English[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 17:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See above. —^Jack_Lumber^/tɔk/ 14:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.