Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 January 9

January 9[edit]

WP:AN/SOCK → Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. This was left over from when WP:RFCU used to be Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Sockpuppets, but is no longer needed. -- JLaTondre 12:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unlikely search term as Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is not apart of the administrators noticeboard, it barely involves administrators. In addition, only 3 pages that are not part of WP:RFCU link there. Iced Kola 22:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-- plenty of other shortcuts available. Dar-Ape 01:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Wizardman 21:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Polish nationalism → Jan Matejko[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 12:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Makes even less sense than redirecting American nationalism to John Ringo or something like this. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 15:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete r3. -Patstuart^talk|edits 19:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's the second time this week that I've seen 'r3' used as a reason to delete a redirect that obviously isn't a typo. Somehow, I don't think the CSD is intended for that. --ais523 11:20, 11 January 2007 (U T C)
Delete Unlikely that someone searching for the redirect would want its target; less useful than a redlink. --ais523 11:20, 11 January 2007 (U T C)
Delete per ais523 Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ais523.--Wizardman 21:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak II → Palm Sunday tornado outbreak of 1994[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted the three Roman numeral ones & Kept the other two. -- JLaTondre 12:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current I,II,III terminology is much more confusing than helpful; some sources and editors are counting 1920 as "I" and 1965 as "II", and others are counting 1965 as "I" and 1994 as "II". It's not something that someone would type into the address bar, either. The current article titles ("of 1920", "of 1965", "of 1994") plus the dab page are enough. Quuxplusone 08:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also redirects nominated for deletion: Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak I, Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak II, Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak (1994), The Palm Sunday Tornado Outbreak. --Quuxplusone 08:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 12:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relist in two groups: the ones that use the confusing I/II/III enumeration and the ones that don't. Failing that, delete the former three and keep the latter two. BigNate37_(T) 00:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.