Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 January 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 4[edit]

List of Manners of Kenny's Death (South Park) → List of Kenny's deaths[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 12:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was originally the target articles but was moved several months ago. All double redirects are pretty much taken care of (if there were any), and there is now no reason for this redirect to exist. Wizardman 05:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - will never be typed in Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If kept, the redirect should be renamed "List of Kenny's deaths (South Park)" Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No one's going to type that. Xiner (talk, email) 23:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Duke of Duchess Street 00:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Chicago study suggests 1.8% of priests possibly child abusers → Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 12:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

highly unlikely search term Lars T. 15:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Will never be typed in. --Wizardman 15:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as unlikely search term. It sounds more like something on Wikinews. Iced Kola 21:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Transwiki - Transwiki the content that was there when the old article was there to Wikinews Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 13:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unlikely search term. --Duke of Duchess Street 00:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

America's Tenor → Daniel Rodriguez[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. There does not seem to be any official designation of America's Tenor. Simply disambig'ing this would probably result in a List of American tenors. Also, the Carl Tanner article does not use that phrase. If anyone wants to attempt to "formalize" the definition of America's Tenor and create a disambig page based upon that, feel free. -- JLaTondre 13:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google search shows that several tenors claim this title, and one of them (not Daniel Rodriguez) claims a trademark on it. FreplySpang 21:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is a possible search term, would a disambiguation not be a better idea? J Milburn 23:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Create into disambiguation page per J Milburn. --Wizardman 01:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per J Milburn - but note that the only other "America's Tenor" with a current article is Carl Tanner. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 15:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per J Milburn Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 14:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per Milburn. Xiner (talk, email) 23:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The Lost World (disambiguation) → The Lost World[edit]

The result of the debate was Withdrawn. -- JLaTondre 15:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term with no incoming links and no significant edit history. Was created when the dab page was moved contrary to Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Page naming conventions. PC78 21:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Links to this type of redirect can signify intentional links to dab pages. I don't see how this is hurting anything. Dekimasu 13:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Dekimasu. Khatru2 07:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn per Category:Redirects to disambiguation pages. PC78 08:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sun's life → Sun[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 12:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because it has been originaly an article proposed for deletion, but someone turned it in to a redirect (probably a user that wasn't a sysop did this). There is no point in having this redirect. If this redirect is kept, it shall be redirected to Sun#Life cycle. Kamope 22:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This page just won't go away. It is a pretty useless redirect, I reckon it should be deleted, just to get rid of it... J Milburn 23:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to stellar evolution, though I would support a keep rather than delete vote, if this were a vote. It does no harm, prevents a duplicate article from being created, and could be considered to be a redirect as a result of merge (except in this case, the original material not previously in the target article was little to none). BigNate37(T) 00:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sun could be a person. Confusing. Xiner (talk, email) 23:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_January_4&oldid=1141907080"