Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 6

December 6[edit]

Ocypode quadrata → Ghost crab[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- species redirect on family -- 217.245.61.109 07:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC). This is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 07:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand the IP's reasoning, but this is one of a half dozen species linked at the bottom of the article (the rest are red). Since it might confuse someone wanting to write an article on this specific species, I'd say delete it.--Kchase T 07:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Helpme → Template:Helpme[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect. Delete Kchase T 01:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Interiot 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Renesis (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cbrown1023 23:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete delete per nom. — Seadog 17:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless cross-namespace redirect. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Dixy chicken 2 → Dixy Chicken[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The destination article had been plagued with vandalism for a very long time, and I suspect that the newer article was created out of frustration. However, the original article has since been fixed, and it already contained all the useful information from the newer article, so I redirected it. Since "Dixy chicken 2" is unlikely ever to be needed as a redirect, I am submitting it for RfD. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 18:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Austin gleeson → Austin Gleeson[edit]

The result of the debate was Kept & tagged with {{R from capitalization}}. -- JLaTondre 01:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is unnecessary - the article search is not generally case sensitive. Jake95 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{R from capitalization}} — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the second word is case sensitive, the first word is not. John Reaves 22:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - makes links un-case senative --T-rex 04:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.