Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 11

< September 10	September 12 >

September 11[edit]

File:Purabi Dutta.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely own work – Train2104 (t • c) 00:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Princesshalliday2017.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely own work, exists in many places online as smaller versions. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emilia Nkanga.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

professional portrait of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 01:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfredo M Santos.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

historic photo of notable individual, dubious own-work claim FASTILY 05:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A less cluttered version of Milky Way Arms.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is seemingly duplicated at Commons, c:File:Milky Way Arms.svg, Also that file (Commons) is GFDL, where does the GPL claim come from as this isn't source code, and no link to source code or a COPYING file seem obvious? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Word processor grey.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as GPL, but no relevant COPYING file link given to confirm the permission, the wordprocessor shown isn't even named. Image is otherwise unused ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windirstat.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not "self-taken" , this is a screenshot, No link to a source repository given, Nor to a COPYING file to confirm the GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ubuntu 11.10 Pre-Beta Screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image not present on Given source. No link to source code repositry or COPYING file given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gtk-gnutella-0.96.8-stable.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No link to source code or repository provided. No link to COPYING file to confirm GPL status of software shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GuyTower.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficent source, also I am having trouble understanding why GPL has been applied to an artwork. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Images of wilber (gimps mascot) remade in a horizontal format, as to better layout the article.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. czar 04:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a source, Where did these come from originally? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, GIMP is cited. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irisappscr1.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sourcing, No link to source repository or COPYING file provided to prove GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K3b 1 91 0 screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sourcing, No link to source repository for software shown or a link to a relevant COPYING file, to confirm GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K9copy version 2 3 5.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sourcing, No link to source repository for the software shown is obvious, nor is a link to a relevant COPYING file to confirm GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keel.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficent sourcing, No direct link to source code provided. (The source linked however confirms GPL3 status of current version of software.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. (and link confirms GPL3) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CMH.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, replaced by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kopete1 setup.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sourcing, no link to relevant source repository or to a COPYING file to confirm GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pts-logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Linked source, does not contain the asset concerned? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdrawn - Source proved to be RAW SVG directly in the source that was linked, rather than an image file as was expected. File is now marked for Commons, and should be deleted locally once transferred.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Project64kemulator1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of software covered by GPL, but no link to releavnt source repository, I'd also like an opinion on whether the screenshot here is purely mechanical ( and thus the PD-self claim for 'arrangement' is irrelevant.). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SuperCollider screenshot2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot is not on the source link given ( had to do a Wayback Machine on this it was a dead link as encountered. There's no link to a source repository given on the file information, and the link on the archive page was instructions on how to get it via a Subversion repository available at the date the page was archived...)

Not sure how to proceed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot was on that source link given, for many years. What problem do you aim to fix? It's not sustainable for wkp to demand that the primary sources remain active indefinitely, surely.

On the software's modern website you can access the file here, and see also the website source here. mcld (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention to detail --mcld (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MeWa.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot is not own work, No link to a source repository is provided, or a link to a COPYING file for the version shown. The Wayback machine's archive for the sourceforge project for the software only goes back to 2008.

Not sure how to proceed, and an updated screenshot would be preferable to an ancient one. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Netxms-ss1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dead source which in any event is a a direct link to the image. The wayback machine found this for 2007 (https://web.archive.org/web/20070209233352/http://www.netxms.org/screenshots/v2/dci_editor.png) but nothing later.

There's no link to a source repository provided or a link to a COPYING file to confirm GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sqmailscreenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is present on the source listed, but the page doesn't say it's GPL outright, The download page doesn't mention GPL either... No link to a source repository is mentioned in the file information here at wikipedia, nor is a link to a COPYING file which would confirm the GPL status of the software shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ubuntu 10.04 pre-alpha screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source provided is dead, making it harder to confirm that's what shown is in fact GPL, as opposed to some other license. No link to a source repository or COPYING file for the software shown is provided in the file information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taskbar-SharpEnviro-v8.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as a 'self' but is a screenshot of nominally GPL software. Is the uploader of this also the author of the GPL covered software? No link to a source repository for the software shown is provided, or a link to a COPYING file which would prove GPL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Over-reaction, assuming good faith. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muhammad Zaidan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: WP:F7 speedy deletion per my findings below -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 07:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lacks fair use rationale and could possibly be a copyvio SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 19:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that the identification is valid, can we not just add Template:Non-free biog-pic to the file page, and use the image at Muhammad Zaidan. The fair use rationale is filled out, and this seems prima facie a valid use of WP:NFCI #10. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Searching under the subject's alternative name of Abu Abbas turned up that this is an AP photo, [1] so this fails NFCC because AP uses these photos for commercial opportunities. Another photo of Zaidan would qualify as fair use though, just not this one.---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sweninstaller.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The licensing on this files claims the screenshot is GPL. The screenshot is of a known malware, and I wasn't aware malware writer used the GPL for their code. If it is GPL, the the file information page is missing a link to a source that confirms it. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No confirmation of GPL license for the software in question. It could be converted to non-free, but I don't necessarily see from the (unsourced) text how it would be useful to identify the concept. czar 04:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewscoopDashboard.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own work, but the license given is GPL. Who wrote the software? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orthodox cross symbol.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of GPL status of artwork on listed source. Did the uploader mean to license as GFDL of which there is no evidence at the source either? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Navifon Screenshot.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 September 20. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navifon Screenshot.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ralink RT2500 chipset 802.11 54Mbps adapter.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 September 20. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ralink RT2500 chipset 802.11 54Mbps adapter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Wahidi Haban.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is almost identical to the commons version (but not so didn't think a F8 CSD was fair), suggest it adds nothing over the commons version and that is a better place. KylieTastic (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heat capacity of 4He 01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Move to Commons. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is almost identical to the commons version (but not quite so didn't think a F8 CSD was fair), I would suggest it adds nothing over the commons version and that is a better place to store the image rather than have two KylieTastic (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons Seeing as the images are almost identical but the Commons version is much smaller at max resolution. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.