Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 March 18

< March 17	March 19 >

March 18[edit]

File:NowYouSeeMeSoundtrackCover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFCC#3a, as album cover art is same as film poster, and soundtrack is not notable on its own MASEM (t) 03:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:76ers logo 1977-97.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8; image only appears in a gallery of non-free historical logos. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Philadelphia 76ers.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8; the image only appears in a non-free gallery of historical logos. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bonn Quiz Contest at Convent of Jesus & Mary, Chelsea.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daryl Coley Promotional Photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that this was actually released under a CC license. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"The Cleanists" title screen from TV and web series The Cleanists.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Large screenshot that is now redundant to much a smaller logo that I've uploaded - File:The Cleanists.jpg. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Intertitle from TV and web series The Cleanists.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary that requires the presence of this image, apart from one brief mention in the list of episodes. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be deleted. It meets the conditions of WP:NFCC#8 because it significantly increases readers' understanding of the television program. The file description lists the names of the four characters in order of appearance in the image, giving readers a visual reference to the character list in the article. — Googersley 20:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just a photo of four people and a blurry head. There is no critical discussion about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:(I've Just Begun) Having My Fun.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This large PNG is now redundant to a much smaller JPG that I've uploaded - File:(I've Just Begun) Having My Fun.jpg. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blank Cheque, British VHS cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: redundant to File:Blank Check film poster.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

I am in favour of keeping the image is because the film Blank Check (also known as Blank Cheque) has had two titles in English. The question I have is what do we do with an article about a film with more than one title in the English Speaking World as I do not know more than two such films. The only other such film I know with two English titles is Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film) (released in the United States as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone). In the English Wikipedia entry for that film both the American and international posters are used at the top of the main infobox showing the different titles. The difference between HP1 and Blank Check is the alternative title Sorcerer's Stone is still officially used whilst Blank Cheque is not. Although the name Black Check is now used on DVD releases throughout the English Speaking World some sources still refer to the film as Blank Cheque. I also feel the alternative poster should be kept because although the old alternative title is no longer with us it is still part of the film's history and the poster would show readers they have found what they are looking for if they search for the film by the alternative title which redirects to Blank Check.

I tried to list the alternative title poster in the main infobox in the style of a music single in this article but was unsuccessful. I don't know if there is a provision for films with more than one title in the same language. Tk420 (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UCLA Ostin Music Center Kevin Daly Architects.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1: there appear to exist finished buildings which can be used to illustrate the article instead. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UCSB San Joaquin Housing, Kevin Daly Architects.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1: there appear to exist finished buildings which can be used to illustrate the article instead. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.