Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international goals scored by Aleksandar Mitrović/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international goals scored by Aleksandar Mitrović[edit]
List of international goals scored by Aleksandar Mitrović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is my first FL nomination so go easy on me. I am nominating this article because it is well-written and reliably sourced throughout, and I think it meets the FL criteria. I'd be happy to address all comments and concerns. Nitpick away! Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments[edit]
- The lead uses his surname a lot (like, in every sentence). I realise he is the subject of the article, but could you vary the language a bit? Even if it's only replacing some of them with "he"?
- "in what was his third international appearance" - unsourced
- "which ultimately ended in 1–2 loss" => "which ultimately ended in a 2–1 defeat"
- "With six goals, Mitrović finished as the top-scorer" - there is no hyphen in "top scorer"
- "Mitrović spearheaded Serbia's promotion to Group A [....] that resulted in Serbia being promoted to League A for the first time" - are "Group A" and "League A" the same thing?
- "a record 14 goals in the UEFA Nations League." - is this just a Serbian record or an all-time record?
- Table needs a note to explain the "score" column
- ....and also one to say that Serbia's score is shown first in each case
- As this is a sortable table, everything (stadia, competition) needs to be linked every time it appears, not just the first
- What's sourcing the "cap" column? Ref 13 does not confirm that it was his third cap, for example
- Hat-tricks column is pointless as it just duplicates content from the table above, and users can easily see from that table when he scored three times in a match
- Footnotes should probably go before See also
- That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for your input. I have made some adjustments based on your comments. Let me know what you think. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- One point - I said "Footnotes should probably go before See also", but you've left them after that section and made them a sub-section of references? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: MOS:NOTES states that notes and references should appear after See also sections. In this case, notes include explanatory footnotes. Making them a sub-section in this case was a personal decision since I felt this part of the article was becoming too cluttered. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, fair enough. In that case support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: MOS:NOTES states that notes and references should appear after See also sections. In this case, notes include explanatory footnotes. Making them a sub-section in this case was a personal decision since I felt this part of the article was becoming too cluttered. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- One point - I said "Footnotes should probably go before See also", but you've left them after that section and made them a sub-section of references? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: looks good -- Idiosincrático (talk) 08:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Mitro Gooool list looks very good ! Боки ✉ 23:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given that some of the reviews are a bit sparse, normally I'd let this one sit for a bit longer, but after reviewing it I'm good to promote. Source review passed as well. --PresN 18:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.