Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arizona Cardinals first-round draft picks/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [1].

---

List of Arizona Cardinals first-round draft picks

List of Arizona Cardinals first-round draft picks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Arizona Cardinals first-round draft picks/archive1

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

This will be list #8 for me in this series and, hopefully, #28 in the series to be promoted. One of the charter members of the NFL and the oldest continuously run professional football franchise, this most resembles and copies the format of my previous nominations of List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks (a fellow charter member and second oldest franchise) and List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks (fifth oldest franchise). As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Pseud 14

• In 1960, the team moved to St. Louis -- I think it would be better to write (and link) as St. Louis, Missouri
• From 1947 through 1958 the NFL designated -- comma after 1958
• In the table notes: Pick used in 1989 supplemental draft. -- I would remove the period
• That's all from me. Solid work as always. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Image review: Passed

• Images have alt text
• Images are appropriately licensed in Commons
• Images are relevant to the article. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

I've implemented all of your suggestions. Thanks so much for taking the time to review and provide feedback @Pseud 14! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• "The team was established [...] and are the" => "The team was established [...] and is the", surely?
• "where they've played their home games since" => "where they have played their home games since"
• Jimmy Lawrence's name is spelt incorrectly in the lead
• Lottery is spelt incorrectly on the 1958 row
• "Arizona received the Washington Redskins's 1977 first-round" => "Arizona received the Washington Redskins' 1977 first-round"
• That's it. Great work as ever, Josh!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for the feedback @ChrisTheDude! I've made the suggested changes and boy do I feel silly about the lottery and "Redskins's" one! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Source review

I will taking ref numbers from this revision [2]. At first glance all refs seem to be from relaible sources. I'll begin manually checking themQuestions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

1. Good
2. Good
3. Good
4. Good
5. Good
6. Good
7. Good
8. Good
9. Good
10. Good
11. Good
12. Good
13. Good
14. Good
15. Good
16. Good
17. Good
18. Good
19. Good
20. Good
21. Good
22. Good
23. Good
24. Good
25. Good
26. Good
27. Good
28. Good
29. Good
30. Good
31. Good
32. Good
33. Good
34. Good
35. Good
36. Good
37. Good
38. Good
39. Good
40. Good
41. Good
42. Good
43. Good
44. Good
45. Good
46. Good
47. Good
48. Good
49. Good
50. Good Consider archiving
51. Good
52. Good
53. Good
54. Good
55. Good
56. Good
57. Good
58. Good
59. Good
60. Don't have a Washington Post subscription I'll have to check the WP:LIBRARY. Regardless consider archiving it
61. Good
62. Good. Consider archiving
63. Good
64. Good
65. Good
66. Good
67. So I ran out of free articles while checking. So I'll have to check the library again
68. I initially thought that this was a tabloid sun but unrelated so good. Consider archiving it
69. Good
70. Good
71. Good
72. Good
73. Good
74. Good

Good job on this. I'll try and get access to those sources I dont have to finish the review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the very thorough review @OlifanofmrTennant. All references are archived, including reference 67, which should allow you to view the source if you go to the archived version. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey @OlifanofmrTennant: Just wanted to confirm whether the source review has been passed or not. As mentioned, all sources should be accessible to you via archive links now. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Support Sorry totally missed you first ping, but yes pass. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.