Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 23

< April 22	April 24 >

April 23[edit]

Category:Samsung Gear games[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Category:Samsung Gear games

Category:Foxbridge[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Category:Foxbridge

Category:Cypriot people by century[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: do not rename. The new proposal should be made in a new nomination for clarity. MER-C 14:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Cypriot people by century to Category:Cypriot people by period

Nominator's rationale: To bring in Category:Ancient Cypriots Rathfelder (talk) 20:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, this is part of a complete set of categories by nationality. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a sucategory to Category:People by century, and the proposal would break the category tree. Dimadick (talk) 09:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way of bringing these two categories together - I mean globally, not just for Cyprus? Its not very helpful to have Fooish people by century seperate from Ancient or mediaeval people of Foo. Rathfelder (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The way it works for Category:Greek people by century is to have Category:Ancient Greeks by century as a sub-cat. However, not all Ancient People categories will be sufficient populated to justify splitting them by century. I suggest just adding e.g. {{category see also|Ancient Cypriots}} on the "by century" pages. – Fayenatic London 15:37, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Fayenatic. Hugo999 (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to withdraw my proposal. Fayenatic's proposal seems to work.Rathfelder (talk) 20:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Honorary citizen of Munich[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Honorary citizen of Munich (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Being an honorary citizen of Munich is generally/always a WP:NONDEFINING characteristic (e.g. of Richard Strauss). Note: There is already a list. See WP:OC#AWARD and previous discussions (e.g. this in 2010). If not deleted, this should be renamed (add "s") to match sibling categories (e.g. Category:Honorary citizens of Hamburg). If deleted, the sibling categories should also be CFDed. DexDor^(talk) 18:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Bondegezou (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DElete also its siblings. The is a NN award. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sultanate of Ifat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 10:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Sultanate of Ifat to Category:Medieval Somalia

Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, and the subcategory page contains links to the two articles in the header so the articles are kept together anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support but do we need to upmerge to more parents? Peterkingiron (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly Category:Medieval Ethiopia as well but it is not that urgent. Ifat was based in (current) Somalia but stretched into (current) Ethiopia. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Religion in France by city[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 15#Religion in France by city

Category:Atheist YouTubers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 3#Category:Atheist YouTubers

Category:Brightline templates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Brightline templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Superseded by Category:Virgin Trains USA templates. Daybeers (talk) 03:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Category has been emptied. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've CSD tagged this under C1. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Backstreet Boys portal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Backstreet Boys portal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Portal was deleted by discussion and userfied. No need for the category anymore. Legacypac (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Bondegezou (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Laicized LGBT Roman Catholic priests[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Laicized LGBT Roman Catholic priests (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: This category has the same BLP/non-notable intersection by orientation issues as the LGBT laicized bishops category below. Of the two people in it now, both are LGBT, but one was laicized in order to enter politics, the other for his "rebellious attitude and beliefs". Even if there were notable priests laicized specifically for their orientation, I think it's a bad idea to try to divide up Category:laicized Roman Catholic priests by the reason for their removal. gnu 57 00:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, following this other discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above, largely also per WP:TRIVIALCAT. Inter&anthro (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and the related discussion about bishops. They could have been nominated together, but to defend the nominator the categories were not even parented... Of course, until proven otherwise, there is no connection between being gay (mostly the case here) and being laicized. Place Clichy (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A rather obvious case of pointed agenda-driven politicing. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Either merge back to Category:laicized Roman Catholic priests or repurpose (and purge) to Category:Laicized paedophile Roman Catholic priests (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), which may be a major cause of them being defrocked and is actually a slander on those who really are LGBT. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.