Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fire sprinkler[edit]

Fire sprinkler – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Fire sprinklers are used as safety devices in many offices, hotels and storage facilities. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support – Globally-renowned topic; article receives many page views. North America1000 17:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 17:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Sims (video game)[edit]

The Sims (video game) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 250 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, also has page view stats, High Importance in WikiProject Video games and is only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom with a global notability. Donnie Park (talk) 16:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 18:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Flea market[edit]

Flea market – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Flea markets are an important market for buying low priced items, which is an important issue for many families. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.
  3. Support – Flea markets get a lot of coverage in reliable sources. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Backfield[edit]

Backfield – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 553 in last 30 days daily hits

  • A paltry article for a term of big significance historically to college football. Cake (talk) 03:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. support - per importance, and overall article quality. --BabbaQ (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per it being Top importance in WikiProject College Football and only Stub class (see Talk.) --Rubbish computer 16:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Whoever nominated these needs to sign them. --Rubbish computer 16:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom.

{{Approved}}. It's unclear who provided the last support above. North America1000 17:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barbershop quartet[edit]

Barbershop quartet – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

Important topic. Sad article.--Coin945 (talk) 09:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support – Well known topic; receives a decent number of page views. North America1000 17:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support – per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support This article needs support. Lots of different institutions (schools ect) have a barbershop quartet. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 05:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 15:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nuuk[edit]

Nuuk – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

– Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  1. support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Support – This article about a topic of international interest (the capital and largest city of Greenland) has received 22,620 page views in the last 30 days and has good potential to be expanded. North America1000 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Make it greener!--Sige |д･) 16:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 21:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of aqueducts in the Roman Empire[edit]

List of aqueducts in the Roman Empire – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Quite expandable, such as by adding descriptions, sources, images, and perhaps reformatting the article into a table format to organize new content that could be added. North America1000 04:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support despite my reservations regarding how easy it is to edit possibly indiscriminate lists (like List of cheeses from a while back.--Coin945 (talk) 05:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Yep--Sige |д･) 22:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 21:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Adrian[edit]

Isabel Adrian – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - Average of 2,000 hits a month daily hits

  • An stub article that could easily be expanded. c/e and better sources needed as well. Has an international career which could be expanded plenty.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom.Lbertolotti (talk) 00:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. Donnie Park (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Rcsprinter123 (message) 22:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Bornebusch[edit]

Josephine Bornebusch – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - Average of 2,500-8,000 hits a month. daily hits

  • An stub article that could easily be expanded. Better sourcing, c/e. International career. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom.Lbertolotti (talk) 00:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. Donnie Park (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Rcsprinter123 (message) 22:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gastropub[edit]

Gastropub – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Well-known concept and topic on multiple continents; this start-class article typically receives over 200 page views a day. North America1000 15:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per nom. Graham (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Butter churning in Nepal[edit]

Butter churning in Nepal – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

A person churning butter in Nepal
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support--Aryan ( है?) 07:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CBSE expression series[edit]

CBSE expression series – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

--Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose There is nothing in this article to even suggest the topic is even notable enough for an article, let alone worthy of attention from this project. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per Athomeinkobe. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 16:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Not an article at this time. North America1000 22:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 22:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cats and the Internet[edit]

Cats and the Internet – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

  • Very interesting and very notable topic.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose - not worthy --Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 05:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Not true.--Coin945 (talk) 10:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose as is already B class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • It was re-rated as B-class by a different user, and I personally do not agree; I still see it very much as a C-class article. It has huge holes in coverage.--Coin945 (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Already well developed; unlikely to receive a great deal of improvements. North America1000 19:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 16:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Hitchcock Presents: The Final Cut[edit]

Alfred Hitchcock Presents: The Final Cut – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - N/A daily hits

It's always fun to create something from scratch. A fun project might be to create this article on a murder mystery video game. :)--Coin945 (talk) 18:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose as I am uncertain as to the overall significance of this. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • As one of the co-founders of TAFI, who's been here from the very beginning, I can tell you that various redlinks have been nominated in the past. None have successfully been chosen as the TAFI article, but I suppose if any nominations were accepted, a stub would likely be created by someone before that day. Still, there's nothing against it. Over the years, various redirects have also been nominated.--Coin945 (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Not against red link nominations, but a single video game of unknown significance or notability with no existent article may not draw in diverse editors for a week's worth of editing. North America1000 20:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - GNG, as the others say. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 16:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheque[edit]

Cheque – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~900 daily hits

  • Article on a part of everyday life with a relatively interesting history and potential legal issues that could be covered. Very poorly sourced and rambling article at the moment. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - room for improvements. Quite high number of hits etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per above points, overall importance and only being C class. --Rubbish computer 00:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose- it is an above average article --Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 09:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I beg to differ. The article has several outdated sections. Is poorly sourced at places. Needs c/e etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support It is an important (but declining) topic. I agree with BabbQ that there are large chunks completely unsourced. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Way way wayyy too developed for TAFI. I am reminded of the very first TAFI (Culture) which I vehemently opposed at te time, and sure enough people were too overwhelmed to hit the edit button. Adding is a much better prospect than copy editing and referencing. Sorry, but I say no.--Coin945 (talk) 10:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support – Very high page views. This well-known topic is of international significance and usage; all countries have transaction accounts that use checking. While rather developed, this type of article is likely to appeal to a diverse variety of editors. North America1000 20:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support per nom--Sığe |д=) 16:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. 3 net support !votes. North America1000 16:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Trace (video game)[edit]

The Trace (video game) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 9 daily hits

A murder mystery video game that should be fun to expand.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Already fairly well developed, low page views; unlikely to receive significant improvements. North America1000 19:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Not notable enough to merit a TAFI. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 01:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 16:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garry's Mod[edit]

Garry's Mod – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 850 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, very high page view stats and its only being Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Of course.--Sige |д･) 07:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Academy of Natural Sciences[edit]

Russian Academy of Natural Sciences – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

– Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom.--Aryan from हि है (talk) 09:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Street fair[edit]

Street fair – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Street fairs are ubiquitous in many parts of the world. Many of us have buyed or will buy something in a street fair. Lbertolotti (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support – Plenty of room for expansion, a topic of international renown. North America1000 22:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 22:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intermediate good[edit]

Intermediate good – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • The market for intermediate goods involves lots of companies, even if they are not well know to consumers. Lbertolotti (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support Seems like there are plenty of ways to expand and improve for those interested in economics and business. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 16:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of elements[edit]

Naming of elements – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

Interesting chemistry-related article.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support - expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per overall significance, also Mid Importance in WikiProject Elements. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. 21 days have passed; 3 net supports are not present. North America1000 04:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hate-watching[edit]

Hate-watching – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support - interesting, could be expanded, better refs. decent amount of hits.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per the potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. 21 days have passed; 3 net supports are not present. North America1000 04:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Public good[edit]

Public good – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Public goods include fresh air, knowledge, public infrastructure, national security, education, common language(s), widespread and high public literacy levels, flood control systems, lighthouses, and street lighting. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom, also high page view stats and can be improved from C class. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 04:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delivery (commerce)[edit]

Delivery (commerce) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • The delivery process is fundamental in the study of logistics and important for gaining competitive advantage in many markets. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom, also fairly high page view stats. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 04:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wholesale[edit]

Wholesale – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Lots of goods we buy have gone trough some form of wholesaling. Lbertolotti (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom, also high page views. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 04:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grey market[edit]

Grey market – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • It is important to asses how widespread grey markets have become, we may be buying items in grey markets without even knowing. Lbertolotti (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom, also high page views. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 04:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pub session[edit]

Pub session – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Various instruments being played at a pub session
  • Has some content, but lacking sources, and seems to be expandable. North America1000 08:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 04:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Water frame[edit]

Water frame – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • The water frame is one of the classic inventions of the Industrial Revolution and was widely used in the textile industry. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per above points, also potential for expansion. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. But we shall go to WP:AFI Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Defying Gravity (song)[edit]

Defying Gravity (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song for an entire week. North America1000 18:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Dreamed a Dream[edit]

I Dreamed a Dream – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 250 daily hits

  1. Support per its overall significance, can be improved from C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – too developed already. North America1000 18:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Music of the Night[edit]

The Music of the Night – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 80 daily hits

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song for an entire week. Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. North America1000 18:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow (song from Annie)[edit]

Tomorrow (song from Annie) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 55 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All That Jazz (song)[edit]

All That Jazz (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 daily hits

  1. Support Comprises nothing more than a list format. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send in the Clowns[edit]

Send in the Clowns – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 300 daily hits

  1. Support:C class, potential for impovement + significant page view stats. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Already rather developed. North America1000 18:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Magic to Do[edit]

Magic to Do – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

  • Famous song from Pippin. Lack of page views is understanding considering the article is an orphan.Coin945 (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Stub with potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cabaret (Cabaret song)[edit]

Cabaret (Cabaret song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

  1. Oppose per low page view stats; unsure as to overall significance. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Has only received four edits in 2015; not convinced this needs a week of work from the project's editors, because it's already of low interest. North America1000 18:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I Were a Rich Man (song)[edit]

If I Were a Rich Man (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 90 daily hits

  1. Support Start class, potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Already fairly developed. How much can this actually be improved? North America1000 18:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the Street Where You Live[edit]

On the Street Where You Live – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 70 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for expansion and improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I have changed the article's class to Start as it appeared too lengthly to be a stub, a rating automatically assigned to it. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Most points seem to be covered in the article. Not convinced this can be significantly expanded through research and collaboration over a week. North America1000 18:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All I Ask of You[edit]

All I Ask of You – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 60 daily hits

  1. Support Stub with potential for expansion and improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On My Own (Les Misérables)[edit]

On My Own (Les Misérables) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 60 daily hits

  1. Support Stub with potential for expansion and improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Could Have Danced All Night[edit]

I Could Have Danced All Night – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 65 daily hits

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Food, Glorious Food[edit]

Food, Glorious Food – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

  1. Support Stub consisting of little more than a list. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True Love (Cole Porter song)[edit]

True Love (Cole Porter song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Memory (song)[edit]

Memory (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 200 daily hits

  1. Support Needs wikifying in places, potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song)[edit]

The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 85 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for expansion and improvement.
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any Dream Will Do (song)[edit]

Any Dream Will Do (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

  1. Support Only Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight (1956 song)[edit]

Tonight (1956 song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song. North America1000 18:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can You Feel the Love Tonight[edit]

Can You Feel the Love Tonight – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 200 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for improvement and expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song for an entire week. North America1000 18:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Time Warp (song)[edit]

Time Warp (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 250 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for improvement and expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song for an entire week. North America1000 18:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin')[edit]

Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin' – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 55 daily hits

  1. Support Potential for improvement and expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unconvinced that an article about one song will receive much improvement over the course of a week. Many editors may not be interested in researching and expanding an article about one song for an entire week. North America1000 18:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cat people and dog people[edit]

Cat people and dog people – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

👍 Like--Coin945 (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Plenty of potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. North America1000 01:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sore throat[edit]

Sore throat – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • This everyday-known article could be expanded to include more general knowledge. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Support per nom. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose as I don't see how this can be substantially expanded without straying onto the topics of existing articles. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose – A common ailment, but not sure if this particular topic will attract a week's worth of improvements, as per the overall limited scope of the topic: "A sore throat (or throat pain) is pain or irritation of the throat." North America1000 18:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Synchronicity[edit]

Dead Synchronicity – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

  • Very good apocalyptic video game.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose per Low importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – low page views, and it's a rather new game; may not be of much interest to a diverse variety of editors. North America1000 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Into That Good Night[edit]

Into That Good Night – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

  1. Oppose per Low importance in WikiProject Television. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Not sure one television episode deserves a week's worth of research and editing; may not garner much interest from the start. North America1000 19:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cluedo (UK game show)[edit]

Cluedo (UK game show) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

  • Very good British murder mystery gameshow.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per significant page view stats and only being Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - Relatively short-lived game show with low to moderate page views. Not sure if this will attract significant interest from editors. North America1000 19:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What Made the Red Man Red?[edit]

What Made the Red Man Red? – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

  1. Oppose Unconvinced as to its overall significance. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40 hits per day @Rubbish computer:.
    Comment: While the page views are significant, I am simply unsure as to whether it is suitable for TAFI: if it was only a Stub, I would vote Support. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Not convinced that one song will attract interest from diverse editors over the course of a week; may not actually be improved much. North America1000 19:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Savages (Pocahontas song)[edit]

Savages (Pocahontas song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 22 daily hits

  1. Oppose Unconvinced as to its overall significance. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - I think expansion is possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Not convinced that one song will attract interest from diverse editors over the course of a week; may not actually be improved much. North America1000 19:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline (book)[edit]

Madeline (book) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

  • Seminal piece of children's literature. Has terrible stubby article.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per High Importance in WikiProject Children's literature. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – too low page views, not of enough interest to the general readership, so unlikely to receive significant improvements. North America1000 19:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finger Physics[edit]

Finger Physics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3 daily hits

  • Really fun iphone app video game series that should be a blask to edit.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per the above. Not convinced this will attract much interest from editors. North America1000 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Games of the Soul[edit]

Seven Games of the Soul – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 8 daily hits

  • Very fascinating game from the 90's that consumed my attention for about 2 whole weeks.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – low page views, dated game. May not attract much improvement over the course of a week. North America1000 19:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jail Yatra (1947 film)[edit]

Jail Yatra (1947 film) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Article on a part of everyday life . Very poorly sourced--Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose as I am unconvinced as to its overall importance: there could have been a significant spike in page views due to it being a new article. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 11:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    comment- hi @Rubbish computer: , It has been a week since your opposition , but the article still have only 4 authors . --Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Aryan hindustan:, I'm sorry but I'm not sure what you mean. Thanks, --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – per the above. Not convinced this will attract much interest from editors. North America1000 19:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible Histories (book series)[edit]

Horrible Histories (book series) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 70 daily hits

  • I worked on this article a number of years ago, and was responsible for creating all the offshoot articles around the stage shows, exhibitions, and also the franchise article. This is an extremely popular book series that deserves a more fleshed out and complete article than this unfinished effort I and others churned out before the TV series (2009-2013) had even really taken off. There are now a treasure chest of sources to uncover and I think we would have a lot of fun exploring it. :)--Coin945 (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose. This article is relatively well written for a children's book series, and has a relatively low number of page views. sst✈ 10:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Behind the facade, it's actually still quite a listy article (when I started on that article, it was basically just lists of books. the entire thing), and the prose sections could really be improved upon. And this franchise is immensely popular. I'd love to see this article hit the heights of Horrible Histories (2009 TV series).--Coin945 (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per its overall significance and only being C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Already well-developed. North America1000 19:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chop Chop (series)[edit]

Chop Chop (series) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

A series of iOS apps that should be fun to expand.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Already fairly well developed, low page views; unlikely to receive significant improvements. North America1000 19:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Golden Wake[edit]

A Golden Wake – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

You can't go wrong with some video game content.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support - an OK article that could be expanded and/or improved with references etc.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Low page views, a bit niche to attract diverse editors; unlikely to receive significant improvements. North America1000 19:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Detective Grimoire[edit]

Detective Grimoire – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

You can't go wrong with some video game content.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per the above. Niche. North America1000 19:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clue Chronicles: Fatal Illusion[edit]

Clue Chronicles: Fatal Illusion – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

A very fascinating video game that belongs to the Clue/Cluedo franchise.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per the above. North America1000 19:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marathon (media)[edit]

Marathon (media) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 55 daily hits

Very confused article that is the result of a couple of merges we did about a year ago. Needs a lot of work to get it up to scratch. It tries to talk about both movie marathons and TV marathons and fails at both--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, also only Stub class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Definitely not stub class despite being incorrectly rated as such on the talk page; it's around c-class. Regardless, it's a bit developed and may not attract diverse types of editors, so may not be improved much. North America1000 19:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greased Lightnin' (song)[edit]

Greased Lightnin' (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

Extremely popular song.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support: How is this only a Stub? --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I can tell you exactly how. The article was created as a basic stub on 3 August 2014‎, and it's received minimal improvements ever since. Crazy, no?--Coin945 (talk) 19:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – One three-minute song may not attract a week's worth of research and editing. North America1000 19:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Dark Room[edit]

A Dark Room – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 75 daily hits

You can't go wrong with some video game content.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per the page view stats. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Unlikely to receive much work over the course of a week, because it's a single video game that is not necessarily very popular. North America1000 19:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe This Time (song)[edit]

Maybe This Time (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 65 daily hits

Very popular song from Caberet.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per page view stats, also plenty of potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – One three-minute song may not attract a week's worth of research and editing; has only been edited four times in 2015. North America1000 19:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Brave Little Toaster (film)[edit]

The Brave Little Toaster (film) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 280 daily hits

I did a lot of work ont this once upon a time, but the article is still quite incomplete and could do with a once- (or twice-)over.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, also has high page view stats and is only C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - Already quite developed, and a once- or -twice-over doesn't necessarily merit a week of research and editing. North America1000 19:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline European Adventures[edit]

Madeline European Adventures – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

Popular children's video game.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose low page views, unlikely to maintain interest for a week's worth of collaboration. North America1000 19:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the World of Music Is Carmen Sandiego? ‎[edit]

Where in the World of Music Is Carmen Sandiego? ‎ – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 6 daily hits

Concert series based on Carmen Sandiego franchise.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats and Low Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - per above. North America1000 19:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wat's Pig[edit]

Wat's Pig – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

Aardman Animations short film that was nominated for an Academy award.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, also only Stub class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – low page views. North America1000 19:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aladdin (Disney franchise)[edit]

Aladdin (Disney franchise) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 150 daily hits

An article that talks about everything Aladdin, beyond the original 1992 Disney film.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per page view stats, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - WP:FANCRUFT with minor elements of promotionalism. North America1000 19:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bombshell (musical)[edit]

Bombshell (musical) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 35 daily hits

The fictional Marilyn Monroe musical from Smash, that has since gotten much real-world attention.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support as is only Stub class, plenty of potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose not convinced this will actually attract interest from diverse editors. North America1000 19:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talking with your mouth full[edit]

Talking with your mouth full – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 (only one day of data) daily hits

Etiquette-based topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per its overall significance. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – a WYSIWYG phrase that is unlikely to receive week's worth of research and improvements. North America1000 19:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar speech[edit]

Oscar speech – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 35 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per its overall significance. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Was previously a TAFI collaboration in July 2015‎ and received only one edit during the entire week, my adding {{portal|Film}} to the article (diff). North America1000 17:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artist's impression[edit]

Artist's impression – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per its overall significance and the article's reliance on a single source. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – A rather niche topic; the article may not actually be improved much. North America1000 17:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Catchiness[edit]

Catchiness – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per its overall significance and only being Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral – was previously a TAFI collaboration in early May 2013, but did not receive much in terms of significant improvements. The topic may not interest a great deal of editors, and the article may not actually be improved much. North America1000 00:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment @Northamerica1000: If I remember correctly, Catchiness was previous a TAFI during the period when 7 or 10 articles were chosen per week, which severely diluted the effectiveness of the TAFI project because people were no longer guided towards one article over the week. During that period, contributions slumped across the board.--Coin945 (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Coin945: Thanks for the input, and nice to hear from you. I'll retain my "neutral" for the time being, though. I'm not convinced that the topic will attract a great deal of improvements. However, I'm not opposing. North America1000 04:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Upon further consideration, opposing, per my comment above (part of which has been struck). North America1000 17:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (1985)[edit]

Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (1985) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

The original, iconic, Carmen Sandiego game.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per page view stats, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – A dated video game from 1985; may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question, rather than from a diverse group of editors. North America1000 19:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just Do It[edit]

Just Do It – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 350 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per page view stats and cultural significance, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – A well known corporate trademark and slogan, but Nike makes more than enough money; doesn't need our efforts to help improve their market share in shoes and apparel. See also: Nike sweatshops (nominated below) and Sweatshop. North America1000 17:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geo-literacy[edit]

Geo-literacy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose per low page view stats, also already C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Low page views, not of enough interest to many people. North America1000 19:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graffiti in Russia[edit]

Graffiti in Russia – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per page view stats, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avalon explosion[edit]

Avalon explosion – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support as is only Stub class: potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose low page views. North America1000 20:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Throw the cat among the pigeons[edit]

Throw the cat among the pigeons – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support as is only Start class, potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Rather niche, being an idiom. I doubt this will actually attract many editors for significant improvements. Lowish to moderate overall page views. North America1000 17:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dog–cat relationship[edit]

Dog–cat relationship – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 95 daily hits

  1. Support - already OK article. But can be expanded.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as is only Stub class: also has significant page view stats. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dominant response[edit]

Dominant response – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

  1. Support Stub with potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Niche topic with low page views. North America1000 18:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support – potential for expansion is there.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Holiness of Palestine[edit]

Holiness of Palestine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

  1. Oppose I would suggest leaving TAFI until after the merger has taken place. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - very low page views. North America1000 20:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Driving etiquette[edit]

Driving etiquette – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 35 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose: Does not appear to be much potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - high on importance topic even to the general public. Donnie Park (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose – "Interesting article" and "support per nom" rationales don't convince me to support. Not sure this would actually be improved much over the course of a week. North America1000 18:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's done is done[edit]

What's done is done – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

  1. Support as is only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – It's an expression, but I'm not sure that this would need an entire week for improvements; this may not actually be improved much as per the topic's limited scope and actual potential for expansion. North America1000 17:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Word recognition[edit]

Word recognition – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 75 daily hits

  1. Support per overall significance, also needs cleanup. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Already fairly developed. North America1000 18:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tetris (Electronic Arts)[edit]

Tetris (Electronic Arts) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 120 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support Very minimal article at present. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – May only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kinect Adventures![edit]

Kinect Adventures! – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 55 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom, high page view stats and Mid Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – As of this post, it has only received six edits for all of 2015 (Revision history). I'm unconvinced that a lot of people will jump in to rapidly improve this article. North America1000 18:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Distraction-conflict[edit]

Distraction-conflict – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

  1. Oppose per low page view stats, doesn't appear to be much potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – Interesting topic, but may not attract many editors for actual improvements per the topic's overall specialized focus vis-à-vis social psychology. North America1000 17:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flight Control (video game)[edit]

Flight Control (video game) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Challenge[edit]

Brain Challenge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support: C class, potential for improvement, has also failed 2 Good Article nominations. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Fighting Illini football[edit]

Illinois Fighting Illini football – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 12,766 in last 30 days daily hits

  • A significant amount of hits to go with the historical significance. Multiple national titles; the team of the likes of Red Grange and Dick Butkus. Cake (talk) 03:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per the high page view stats, only being Stub class and its High importance in WikiProject College Football. --Rubbish computer 16:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - high number of views.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nike sweatshops[edit]

Nike sweatshops – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 267 daily hits

  • Socially important topic with potential for improvement. North America1000 17:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. support – per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 23:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 01:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Price ceiling[edit]

Price ceiling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 199 daily hits

  • Price ceiling is a classic problem studied in economics. Lbertolotti (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Oppose - Already fairly developed, although it does receive a lot of page views. North America1000 22:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retractable pen[edit]

Retractable pen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 daily hits

  • Originally titled pen clicking, this is an interesting article that deserves more attention.--Coin945 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Due to the subject's overall significance, currently only C class but being checked for B criteria. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – It's unclear if this article will actually receive much in terms of improvement, because it is a rather niche, narrow topic and the article seems to cover most aspects of it. North America1000 01:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support – {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support - seems like it could reasonably be improved.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 01:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 12:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/11&oldid=1138375066"