Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe McConnell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. If the subject of this article has issues with it then go here for instructions on how to contact the foundation. No prejudice against a speedy renomination. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe McConnell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable former model WuhWuzDat 19:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article shows very little notability in the normal sense of this word, and the sources seem to be branches of her promoter-cum-employer. But maybe there's something else to her. -- Hoary (talk) 07:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Why no picture of one of the most beautiful girls to ever grace the great British institution that is The Sun page 3. Zoe is my all time favourite page 3 model. She is also a very talented photographer. I checked her Wikipedia page to check to see if she is married. No info, why? Someone must know if this gorgeous woman is married or not. This page should not be deleted; it should be enhanced with a picture and more insight into Zoe's life and career. --HMFC1965 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Why no picture [...?]" Because nobody is known to have provided one that has any of the applicable copyleft licences. If you can provide "insight into Zoe's life and career" (of course reliably sourced), this would help the chances of the article. If you could also provide a suitably copyleft photograph, then this would be the icing on the cheesecake, as it were. (See also WP:HOTTIE.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please remove this page - Zoe Mcconnell would like this page removed as some of the information on it, that we are unable to edit without ‘vandalism’, is detrimental to her current and future business. Due to its position in Google it now comes up as the number one search. This page was not created by Zoe Mcconnell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.103.232.132 (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. If it's deleted it won't matter, but if this article survives this deletion discussion (whether or not it was written by Ms McConell is not relevant), then please explain the problematic material on the article Talk page and I'll be happy to look at it for you -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ^X 20:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.