Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Laboratories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zee Laboratories[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources per WP:NCORP. Vrac (talk) 14:24, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Vrac (talk) 14:24, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't really find any true coverage for this company to show that it meets notability guidelines. There were a handful of news sources talking about how they got a notable actress to hawk their products and some negative coverage over their products ([1]), but most of the coverage was brief trivial mentions about how the India government was ordering from "dubious" (their description, not mine) companies like Zee Laboratories. ([2], [3]) Sometimes these things can make a company notable, but in this case none of it was particularly heavy enough to really show notability. This could probably be speedied as sheer promotion, given how the page was written, but I think that this would benefit from a full AfD just in case some sources do exist (ie, not in English). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -There are few passing mentions of the subject in some reliable sources ([4]). They however have received full-page negative coverage for Income tax-raid on their premises ([5]). To put it all, they don't meet WP:CORPDEPTH standard and qualify for deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the others. The coverage is not significant enough. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 21:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Becky Sayles (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per User:Tokyogirl79's argument. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 19:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.