Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zed Gossip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zed Gossip[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT, as per several source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Even if they do risk their lives in search of celebrity gossip, like nom I could find no coverage. Yvarta (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 16:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Dane2007 ^talk 19:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.