Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaynab Khadr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Khadr family. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 12:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zaynab Khadr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear how this would meet notability standards. Being the sister/daughter of somewhat notable people does not make you notable. I cannot imagine why she would warrant an article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 14:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and selectively merge to Khadr family. Heavily oversourced article lacking a clear claim to notability. WP:SIGCOV is lacking. Many sources merely mention this woman in article about her family, others are from minor, perhaps unreliable sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge content to Khadr family. I should note that I made the opposite argument in 2008 on Talk:Zaynab Khadr, but based on modern Wikipedia standards of notability and Zaynab Khadr's relatively low profile in the intervening period, I think a merge is now in order. That said, I favour keeping the bulk of the content in the merged article; I think it's at most slightly oversourced. --Saforrest (talk) 22:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect the page. She is not notable enough for stand-alone article, merge the useful information. Greenbörg (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge content to Khadr family. - GretLomborg (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.