Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanané Rajsingh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zanané Rajsingh[edit]

Zanané Rajsingh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film director. No indications of notability for this Indian film director. Some minor film festival notices, but not sufficient to meet inclusion criteria. Most citations are to youtube or facebook posts. Article appears to be entirely promotional, created by the subject himself and edited by a COI user representing a film that Rajsingh has directed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unless there is a ton of sources in one of the Indian dialects, there just isn't any notability for him. We have two articles about a festival he helped put together, which helps, but there's just a huge lack of coverage out there. This is somewhat telling, as entertainment people usually get quite a bit of coverage in India. If someone can find coverage in foreign language sources I'm willing to change my opinion, but offhand this just doesn't seem to be a person who has received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. The film festival might pass in a year or two if it gains more coverage, but all we have are the two sources for the first event in 2013. That's not enough to warrant a page for that. I'd nominate this for a speedy under promotional issues, but I do want to give this a little bit of a chance to get some people fluent in the dialects of India to look for sources. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.