Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You (Schiller song)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 November 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You (Schiller song)[edit]

Article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG ☎ 02:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per our editing policy, which makes it clear verifiable information should be retained in some form, whether through rewriting or merging. Hiding T 12:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Song didn't chart and doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Source has been added. We don't delete useful info if we can verify it. Merge it and redirect it per policy. Hiding T 19:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Merge it where? It is not on the tracklist of the linked album. We delete verified information all the time, if it is not notable. Where does policy say anything that is verified cannot be deleted? I could make an article on myself and provide sources show i exist, does that mean i merit an article on wikipedia? Non-charting singles are almost always not notable (and the sources give conflicting info anyway, seeing a source there is not enough, you have to check what irt really says.)Yobmod (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merge it to Schiller (band). From your comments you seem to be unfamiliar with our editing policy, which surprises me a little, so I must be misunderstanding you, or you me. You also seem to be misunderstanding why we delete things. Hiding T 12:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like irrelevancy for an encyclopedia? Irrelevancy is one of the exceptions listed in WP:EP. VG ☎ 17:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you are asserting the information contained within this article is irrelevant to any article; that there is no article to which this material is relevant and could therefore be merged to? Hiding T 08:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable single. Note, according to the source given, it will not be released until 31st Oktober. So recreation if it charted when really released.Yobmod (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Hasn't charted, no awards, no notable covers. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.