Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesha Camile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yesha Camile[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article possibly made by user affiliated with subject, no sources mention the subject and the only reference in the article links to an inappropriate site PRmaster1 (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Philippines. PRmaster1 (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR. GNews has articles which mention her as part of a cast for a television series but nothing in-depth about her. No hits on GNews archives as well. It's probably also a bad idea to have an poorly referenced article for a minor. --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep She was winner of Promil Pre-School i-Shine Talent Camp and bagged only 2 leading roles on TV. Can't find anything else beyond that, but it's close to meeting WP:ENT IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG, BIO. This might be TOOSOON, but BLPs should have solid references. BEFORE showed promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 06:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (soft) because of the total lack of reliable sources and it being WP:TOOSOON for a child actress in reality shows. In a pinch, I could reach out to my niece in Manila for sources. Bearian (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.