Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow (2006 feature film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow (2006 feature film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added a few things. to the page. Please have a look. Keep.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Variety and TV Guide reviews are enough to pass WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 02:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is also a review in the Los Angeles Times. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 08:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and comment. Since the fall of 2023, The Film Creator has nominated 28 articles for deletion with only 3 closing as delete. That's pretty remarkable. Of the articles that were kept, half were kept speedily. This verges on a situation where The Film Creator should seriously consider if they should refrain from starting more AFDs. From the many film nominations, it can be widely observed that: (a) Rotten Tomatoes is useless in many cases. (b) The Film Creator is unable to find reviews that other users have little problems finding. Why is that? (c) The Film Creator should learn from these users, and maybe even contact them directly instead of wasting everyone's time with ill-conceived nominations. (d) Sure, the articles are improved through this process, but AFD is not cleanup. Geschichte (talk) 12:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per added sources. Toughpigs (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. TROUT for The Film Creator and I suggest closing this as speedy keep. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw this nomination. Apparently, I need to practice WP:BEFORE more carefully. I vow not to nominate any film articles for the rest of 2024. The Film Creator (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.