Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yashaswini Dayama

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phobia (2016 film). Sort of the redirect equivalent to WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yashaswini Dayama[edit]

Yashaswini Dayama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Young actress which may very well become notable (I do wish her the best) but is currently not there yet. She's had one significant role, though not a leading role, so far and all seven of the references provided by the article link to reviews of that one film and only mention her name in passing as a member of the cast. I haven't been able to find reliable sources that discuss her in more depth so I believe she fails both the basic notability criterion and the actor-specific guideline. Pichpich (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Phobia (2016 film), the only film she has appeared into as of yet. May qualify for a standalone article sometime in future, then we can return the redirect into article. Anup [Talk] 18:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.