Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wynn Irwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 19:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wynn Irwin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Only ref is a mention in a book of obituaries. Searches reveal little better. Appeared to have been a steady bit-part film actor who never hit the big time. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he had very small roles, often red shirts, in major films. Bearian (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep regular on one show and additional roles in other shows and films. I'm seeing results in archives. I will need the rest of the day to add them. Please don't close as delete. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Amkgp 💬 17:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment I added some sources. He had multiple roles of note. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider sourcing added.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have revisited the refs, courtesy of Ancestry's clippings service, and I suspect Wynn Irwin would not thank the reviewing critics. I doubt he was happy about his reviews when he was alive. Now, they don't add anything of significance to notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, wrong, reviews and feature articles add plenty to notability. Your comment about perceived negative reception has nothing to do with notability. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 02:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, would seem to meet GNG through [1], [2], [3], and numerous mentions (in less detail) in reviews of works he acted in. The quality of the reviews is irrelevant. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with GNG, possibly also enough to meet NACTOR. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)strike !vote of sock, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FlyboyExeter. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eddie891. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 16:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe he meets the GNG from the coverage Eddie891 found. Not sure if he meets NACTOR, but is probably close to it for his role in the movie Dirtymouth (where he is 3rd billed), and a few TV roles seem notable enough like Lotsa Luck (series regular) and Hart to Hart (recurring role in 10 episodes). GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GNG pass doesn't require SNG pass. Only one criteria needs to be met. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 17:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.