Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woven Knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Woven Knowledge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an unsourced essay. The origination of the term is given, but without any actual references, its notability is unclear, and the content reads as an original research piece that is a "how-to" on applying this concept in one's life. Contested PROD. Kinu ^t/_c 16:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also see the related AfDs for Jacob Lindborg, Design is Not a Matter of Taste, It's a Business, and Exponential Design Weight. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:38, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as something made up one day. Two editors (under investigation at WP:SPI) have been systematically creating articles about the concepts introduced by a single author in that author's single (and apparently non-notable) design text. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Concur with the above, and I'll add that a gsearch for "'woven knowledge' lindborg" returns two hits: this Wikipedia article, and the Wikipedia article about his book. All other mentions of "woven knowledge" seem to be unrelated and diffuse. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI: the page creator (of this and other Lindborg-related articles) was banned as a sock puppet (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TommFreemann). --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.