Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodsmen Australian Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to South East Queensland AFL. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Woodsmen Australian Football Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur team. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources The-Pope (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 03:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to South East Queensland AFL as that appears to be the comp they play in and it could be a plausible search term. If it is redirected we could probably then just protect the redirect so it can't be recreated if that's a concern. Jenks24 (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Jenks24. In fact, I think all of the team articles listed at South East Queensland AFL#Current Clubs could be put up for deletion. I haven't looked at all of them, but most appear to be unreferenced articles of amateur teams. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I suppose if that's best as I found nothing better than some links with browser. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.