Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Cape Verde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Cape Verde[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this topic could be encyclopedic, this article is a stub with nothing worth saving. It's three sentences of advice for tourists which provides no insights or background into the role of women in Cape Verde. Pburka (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This article from July 2008 serves no useful purpose and should be dynamited. The reference to 'macho culture' may be useful to tourists but not to the real women of Cape Verde. --Artene50 (talk) 05:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. I'm all for WP:MAKESTUBS, but this is ridiculous. An article like this should not be a stub. Instead, it should be a history of treatment of women in Cape Verde through the ages. Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Mew ♠ Tail} 17:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I hate to say it, but we may have to blow it up and start over. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.