Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hope (actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
William Hope (actor)[edit]
- William Hope (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has no references and the fact that he doesn;t see too notable CMOTalk, you must 13:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Someone who has acted in so many films (largely A films), who is linked to from some 38 other articles, and who also has articles on the Finnish, German and Japanese Wikipedias has to be notable; I'm sure it is just a matter of looking hard enough (not easy with his name!) to find sources. --Lambiam 17:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The actor is plenty notable though the page has been the target of some problems over the last few months. Millahnna (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to pass WP:ENT. Being unref'd is not grounds for deletion. Lugnuts (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per above.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Lugnuts. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WithdrawI see that is a favorable keep votes. Let's withdraw this case please CMOTalk, you must 02:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.