Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Am I (Drapht album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep-- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 09:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who Am I (Drapht album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn by nominator. Flat Out (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS. "Articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to into the artist's article or discography." Flat Out (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough content for an article. Not worth a redirect from this title. --Michig (talk) 07:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article cites three reviews (two, now with archiveurls) and could be expanded to Start class: passes WP:NALBAMS.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there is more than enough for an article to be start class & doesn't fail WP:NALBUMS . Dan arndt (talk) 14:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sufficient improvements made Rainbow unicorn (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article content beyond the tracklisting is cobbled together largely from directory websites, posts by the artist's record company, and reviews that are either user-generated, from webzines of dubious reliability, or web forum posts. The only one that looks a reliable source is The Mercury and that's quite brief. The rest has been padded out to largely duplicate the section on the album in the Drapht article. I still don't see a good case for keeping this. --Michig (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the fact that it has been included in the National Film and Sound Archive is not significant. Dan arndt (talk) 01:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not very. I mean, that's a notable thing, but not so much it "deserves" a separate article rather than a note in the band article - David Gerard (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.