Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Krieglstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Krieglstein[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:PROF. Likely a WP:VANITY page. jps (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Philosophy, and Psychology. jps (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Czech Republic, Germany, and United States of America. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - not widely cited in scholar, doesn't seem to meet any other requirements of WP:PROF - car chasm (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be part of a WALL of the creator's parents (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryann Krieglstein and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendental perspectivism). There are only a handful of citations to this person's scholarly work and nothing else that really goes toward satisfying PROF. 128.252.154.2 (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not voting since this is my father. I've had my COI announced on the top of my user page for over a decade. I haven't edited this page since 2015 and have no plans of violating COI and editing ever again. Some citations in this article are in need of some wayback machine links. I top-loaded the relevant WP:PROF citations in the lead since that is what I thought one did back then. My work on this article was before I knew about Articles for Creation and that peer-review process for COI. I have since used that process successfully. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 21:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.