Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weihwa Chinese School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Washington Metropolitan Association of Chinese Schools. The rationiale behind the sole keep comment has been acknowledged not to apply. Since a clear redirect target exists, I'm closing this as redirect vice delete per WP:PRESERVE. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weihwa Chinese School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. Should apply under CSD criteria but it doesn't, so it's here. Shadowjams (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 15:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All high schools are notable. - Eastmain (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If the article is kept, it should be moved to Wei Hwa Chinese School. See the school's website. - Eastmain (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I don't believe it's a high school, but a "language school." If I'm wrong about that distinction then that would change my opinion. Shadowjams (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Shadowjams is correct. The school offers courses (primarily Chinese language courses) aimed at students from kindergarten to high school levels (as well as some adult activities courses), but it only operates on weekends, as far as I can tell. See http://weihwa.schools.officelive.com/CoursesProspectus.aspx - Eastmain (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero signs of non-trivial WP:RS coverage either in English or in Chinese. cab (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.