Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warcraft III Eternal World Rankings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warcraft III Eternal World Rankings[edit]
- Warcraft III Eternal World Rankings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not suitable for Wikipedia, this seems to be a record keeping of some Warcraft III tournament Fangz of Blood 15:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Fangz of Blood 15:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per nom. Clearly unencyclopedic. --Evb-wiki (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree, it looks like a ranking without notability. Xymmax (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- list with no context nor notability. Epthorn (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be an alternate compilation of information already contained on Warcraft III World Championships. -Verdatum (talk) 17:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lists of video game players/tournaments are not generally encyclopedia worthy, unless verifiable by reliable sources. Interestingly, Warcraft III World Championships seems to have tons of references, but they are all just URLs in ref tags, so I'm unsure how many of them would actually be considered reliable sources. While I admit I don't play that particular game, it does seem to have "professional world championships", so if enough reliable sources could be found for this list, I may reconsider my opinion. Ariel♥Gold 19:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.